• Football
• Leagues
• Latvia
• Virsliga
• BFC Daugavpils x Rigas Futbola Skola

BFC Daugavpils - Rigas Futbola Skola 13.05.2026

• 13/05/26 11:00 |
  Round 12
• BFC Daugavpils
  • 0 : 1
  • Finished
  Rigas Futbola Skola

  Lemajic D. - 34'

Summary Player Statistics

BFC

Match details

RFS

1st Half 0:1

34 Lemajic D.

2nd Half 0:0

BFC

Statistics

RFS

0.31

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

2.03

31 %

Ball possession

69 %

7

Total shots

21

10 Matches

4 - Wins

1 - Draws

5 - Losses

10 Matches

1 - Wins

3 - Draws

6 - Losses

10 Matches

4 - Wins

2 - Draws

4 - Losses

10 Matches

Wins - 7

Draws - 2

Losses - 1

10 Matches

Wins - 9

Draws - 1

Losses - 0

10 Matches

Wins - 8

Draws - 1

Losses - 1

• 60% 6/10
• Both team to score
• 2/10 20%

• 44%
• Ball possession
• 65%

• 14 1.4
• Goals scored per match
• 23 2.3

• 9.44 0.94
• xG (Expected Goals) per match
• 13.18 1.32

• 17 1.7
• Goals conceded per match
• 9 0.9

• 13.13 1.31
• Expected goals conceded (xCG) per match
• 3.45 0.35

Full Stats

BFC

H2H Stats

RFS

All tournaments Virsliga 1.Liga Latvijas Kauss Club Friendly Games 5 matches 10 matches 15 matches All matches 5 matches 10 matches 15 matches All matches 5 matches 5 matches 5 matches

• 0wins
• 0draws
• 100% 5wins

More H2H

Chat

Be the first to leave a comment

Go to chat

Top Scorers

BFC Daugavpils

Latvia Virsliga

No data available

Rigas Futbola Skola

Latvia Virsliga

No data available

Match facts

The most common result of matches between BFC Daugavpils and FC RFS is 1-2. 7 matches have ended with this result.

During the last 19 meetings with BFC Daugavpils playing at home, BFC Daugavpils have won 2 times, there have been 1 draws while FC RFS have won 16 times. The goal difference is 45-14 in favour of FC RFS.

During the last 42 meetings, BFC Daugavpils have won 3 times, there have been 3 draws while FC RFS have won 36 times. The goal difference is 112-32 in favour of FC RFS.

BFC Daugavpils's last home win against FC RFS was in 2016.

Did you know that BFC Daugavpils scores 50% of their goals between the minutes 46-60? This is the highest percentage in the league.

Did you know that FC RFS scores 20% of their goals between the minutes 61-75?

FC RFS haven't lost in their last 7 games.

FC RFS have a winning streak of 5 matches away from home.

FC RFS have lost none of their last 12 away matches.

BFC Daugavpils haven't won any of their last 9 games against FC RFS.

BFC Daugavpils haven't scored in 2 of their 6 home matches in Virsliga this season.

FC RFS haven't scored in 0 of their 5 away matches in Virsliga this season.

FC RFS's away record this season: 5-0-0.

Artem Garzha is BFC Daugavpils's top scorer with 4 goals. Janis Ikaunieks has scored 5 times for FC RFS.

FC RFS have scored at least one goal for 7 consecutive matches.

BFC Daugavpils wins 1st half in 29% of their matches, FC RFS in 44% of their matches.

BFC Daugavpils wins 29% of halftimes, FC RFS wins 44%.

The winner of their last meeting was FC RFS.

On their last meeting FC RFS won by 3 goals.

When BFC Daugavpils leads 1-0 at home, they win in 77% of their matches.

When FC RFS leads 0-1 away, they win in 86% of their matches.

When BFC Daugavpils is down 0-1 home, they win 20% of their matches.

When FC RFS is down 1-0 away, they win 37% of their matches.

In Virsliga, FC RFS has better performance than BFC Daugavpils.

FC RFS's performance of the last 5 matches is better than BFC Daugavpils's.

FC RFS have lost just 0 of their last 5 games against BFC Daugavpils (in all competitions).

In the last 5 meetings BFC Daugavpils won 0, FC RFS won 5, 0 draws.

FC RFS have lost just 0 of their last 5 Virsliga games against BFC Daugavpils.

BFC Daugavpils have won just 0 of their last 5 Virsliga games against FC RFS.

BFC Daugavpils scores 1 goals in a match against FC RFS and FC RFS scores 4.6 goals against BFC Daugavpils (on average).

Average number of goals in meetings between BFC Daugavpils and FC RFS is 5.6.

Average number of goals in the first half in meetings between BFC Daugavpils and FC RFS is 2.4.

BFC Daugavpils scores 1.4 goals when playing at home and FC RFS scores 2.12 goals when playing away (on average).

BFC Daugavpils haven't won in their last 4 games.

More facts

Predictions

As part of the Virsliga (Latvia) tournament, the match between teams BFC Daugavpils and Rigas Futbola Skola is scheduled. The game will start on 13.05 at 11:00. All sports bettors can follow in-depth BFC Daugavpils Rigas Futbola Skola betting tips using the subsequent analysis of teams' statistics and prediction for the match.

4 / 10 of her last matches BFC Daugavpils in all competitions ended in defeat

4 / 10 of last matches BFC Daugavpils in Virsliga ended in defeat

8 / 10 of last matches Rigas Futbola Skola in all tournaments ended with her victory

8 / 10 of last matches Rigas Futbola Skola in Virsliga ended with her victory

9 / 10 of last matches between the teams ended in victory Rigas Futbola Skola

3 / 10 of last matches BFC Daugavpils in all competitions, at least one team did not score

More predictions

BFC

Standings

RFS

Latvia Virsliga

#	Team	GP	W	D	L	G	GD	P
1	Rigas Futbola Skola	21	18	1	2	53:15	38	55
2	Riga FC	21	16	4	1	62:19	43	52
5	Jelgava	21	6	7	8	24:35	-11	25
6	BFC Daugavpils	21	6	6	9	22:28	-6	24
7	Super Nova	20	6	3	11	20:32	-12	21

Full Standings

Player Statistics

Overall BFC Daugavpils Rigas Futbola Skola

Overview

Shots

Attack

Defending

Goalkeeping

Overview

Player	Grade	Minutes played	Goals	xG	Assists	xA	Total shots	Passes	Yellow cards	Red cards
Ikaunieks J. Midfielder	7.7	90	-	0.65	-	0.14	6	55/62(89%)	-	-
Zelenkovs D. Midfielder	7.5	90	-	0.16	-	0.16	3	59/65(91%)	-	-
Veips R. Defender	7.3	90	-	-	-	0.03	-	70/75(93%)	-	-
Beks J. Goalkeeper	7	90	-	-	-	-	-	17/39(44%)	-	-
Mankenda G. Forward	6.5	45	-	-	-	0.19	-	9/13(69%)	-	-

xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Shots

Player	Total shots	Shots on target	xGOT	Shots off target	Blocked shots	Shots header	Shots inside the Box	Shots outside the Box
Ikaunieks J. Midfielder	6	2	0.49	2	2	4	6	-
Zelenkovs D. Midfielder	3	1	0.24	-	2	-	1	2
Beks J. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Mankenda G. Forward	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Veips R. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.

Attack

Player	Touches in the opposition Box	Passes	Big chances created	Big chances missed	Assists	xA	Passes in final third	Touches	Passes long	Crosses	Successful dribbles	Fouled	Offsides
Ikaunieks J. Midfielder	11	55/62(89%)	-	-	-	0.14	22/27(81%)	91	1/2(50%)	2/4(50%)	-	3	-
Zelenkovs D. Midfielder	3	59/65(91%)	-	-	-	0.16	22/25(88%)	92	1/4(25%)	2/4(50%)	3/4(75%)	1	-
Mankenda G. Forward	2	9/13(69%)	-	-	-	0.19	5/6(83%)	27	1/3(33%)	2/3(67%)	1/2(50%)	-	-
Beks J. Goalkeeper	-	17/39(44%)	-	-	-	-	1/5(20%)	51	7/29(24%)	-	-	1	-
Veips R. Defender	-	70/75(93%)	-	-	-	0.03	9/11(82%)	81	2/5(40%)	-	-	1	-

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Defending

Player	Duels	Aerial duels	Ground duels	Foules	Tackles	Interceptions	Clearances	Error leading to goal	Error leading to shot	Own goals
Ikaunieks J. Midfielder	12	4/4(100%)	4/8(50%)	-	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-
Zelenkovs D. Midfielder	9	1/1(100%)	5/8(63%)	2	1/1(100%)	1	-	-	-	-
Veips R. Defender	8	6/6(100%)	2/2(100%)	-	1/1(100%)	1	2	-	-	-
Mankenda G. Forward	5	-	2/5(40%)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Beks J. Goalkeeper	1	-	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	1	-	-	-

Goalkeeping

Player	Goals prevented	Goalkeeper saves	xGOT faced	Goals Conceded	Punches	Throws	Sweeper keeper actions
Beks J. Goalkeeper	0.55	5	1.55	1	1	4	-

Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.

xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.