• Football
• Leagues
• Latvia
• Virsliga
• BFC Daugavpils x Super Nova

BFC Daugavpils - Super Nova 27.04.2026

• 27/04/26 11:00 |
  Round 9
• BFC Daugavpils
  • 0 : 1
  • Finished
  Super Nova

  Garcia F. - 89'

Summary Player Statistics

BFC

Match details

SUN

1st Half 0:0

2nd Half 0:1

89 Garcia F.

BFC

Statistics

SUN

0.25

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

0.03

53 %

Ball possession

47 %

4

Total shots

1

• 1.6 1 1.2
• Goals scored per match
• 1.2 1.2 1.3

• 1.1 2.4 1.8
• Goals conceded per match
• 1.8 1.5 1.6

• 33.3' 26.5' 30'
• Minutes/Goal scored
• 30' 33.3' 31'

Full Stats

BFC

H2H Stats

SUN

All tournaments Virsliga 1.Liga 5 matches 10 matches 15 matches All matches 5 matches 10 matches 15 matches All matches 5 matches

• 0wins
• 60% 3draws
• 40% 2wins

More H2H

Chat

Be the first to leave a comment

Go to chat

Top Scorers

BFC Daugavpils

Latvia Virsliga

No data available

Super Nova

Latvia Virsliga

No data available

Match facts

The most common result of matches between BFC Daugavpils and SK Super Nova is 1-1. 3 matches have ended with this result.

During the last 8 meetings with BFC Daugavpils playing at home, BFC Daugavpils have won 5 times, there have been 3 draws while SK Super Nova have won 0 times. The goal difference is 17-4 in favour of BFC Daugavpils.

During the last 15 meetings, BFC Daugavpils have won 8 times, there have been 5 draws while SK Super Nova have won 2 times. The goal difference is 26-11 in favour of BFC Daugavpils.

BFC Daugavpils have a winning streak of 4 matches in Virsliga.

In Virsliga, BFC Daugavpils have 3 successive home wins.

Did you know that BFC Daugavpils scores 50% of their goals between the minutes 46-60?

BFC Daugavpils have a winning streak of 4 matches.

BFC Daugavpils have won 3 home matches in a row.

When playing at home, BFC Daugavpils have not lost to SK Super Nova in their last 8 encounters.

BFC Daugavpils haven't scored in 1 of their 4 home matches in Virsliga this season.

SK Super Nova haven't scored in 1 of their 5 away matches in Virsliga this season.

BFC Daugavpils have scored at least one goal for 7 consecutive matches.

BFC Daugavpils wins 1st half in 29% of their matches, SK Super Nova in 24% of their matches.

BFC Daugavpils wins 29% of halftimes, SK Super Nova wins 24%.

Their last meeting was a draw. (2-2)

When BFC Daugavpils leads 1-0 at home, they win in 77% of their matches.

When SK Super Nova leads 0-1 away, they win in 66% of their matches.

When BFC Daugavpils is down 0-1 home, they win 25% of their matches.

When SK Super Nova is down 1-0 away, they win 0% of their matches.

In Virsliga, BFC Daugavpils has better performance than SK Super Nova.

BFC Daugavpils's performance of the last 5 matches is better than SK Super Nova's.

In the last 5 meetings BFC Daugavpils won 1, SK Super Nova won 1, 3 draws.

BFC Daugavpils scores 1.2 goals in a match against SK Super Nova and SK Super Nova scores 1.6 goals against BFC Daugavpils (on average).

Average number of goals in meetings between BFC Daugavpils and SK Super Nova is 2.8.

Average number of goals in the first half in meetings between BFC Daugavpils and SK Super Nova is 1.4.

BFC Daugavpils scores 1.5 goals when playing at home and SK Super Nova scores 1.26 goals when playing away (on average).

BFC Daugavpils haven't lost in their last 5 games.

Both teams haven't won their last match in Virsliga.

SK Super Nova have a losing streak of 3 matches in Virsliga.

SK Super Nova have lost 3 matches in a row.

More facts

Predictions

As part of the Virsliga (Latvia) tournament, the match between teams BFC Daugavpils and Super Nova is scheduled. The game will start on 27.04 at 11:00. All sports bettors can follow in-depth BFC Daugavpils Super Nova betting tips using the subsequent analysis of teams' statistics and prediction for the match.

9 / 10 of last matches in all competitions BFC Daugavpils did not draw

9 / 10 of last matches in Virsliga BFC Daugavpils did not draw

6 / 10 of the last matches between the teams ended in a win

9 / 10 of last matches in all competitions Super Nova did not draw

9 / 10 of last matches in Virsliga Super Nova did not draw

5 / 10 of last matches BFC Daugavpils in all competitions, at least one team did not score

More predictions

BFC

Standings

SUN

Latvia Virsliga

#	Team	GP	W	D	L	G	GD	P
3	Auda	19	12	2	5	36:23	13	38
4	Liepaja	19	7	4	8	23:29	-6	25
5	BFC Daugavpils	19	6	5	8	21:25	-4	23
6	Super Nova	19	6	3	10	19:27	-8	21
7	Jelgava	19	4	7	8	17:34	-17	19
8	Tukums 2000	19	3	8	8	33:36	-3	17

Full Standings

Player Statistics

Overall BFC Daugavpils Super Nova

Overview

Shots

Attack

Defending

Goalkeeping

Overview

Player	Grade	Minutes played	Goals	xG	Assists	xA	Total shots	Passes	Yellow cards	Red cards
Emsis E. Midfielder	7.5	90	-	0.13	-	0.11	1	20/32(63%)	-	-
Beks J. Goalkeeper	6	90	-	-	-	-	-	16/30(53%)	-	-

xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Shots

Player	Total shots	Shots on target	xGOT	Shots off target	Blocked shots	Shots header	Shots inside the Box	Shots outside the Box
Emsis E. Midfielder	1	-	-	-	1	-	1	-
Beks J. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.

Attack

Player	Touches in the opposition Box	Passes	Big chances created	Big chances missed	Assists	xA	Passes in final third	Touches	Passes long	Crosses	Successful dribbles	Fouled	Offsides
Emsis E. Midfielder	3	20/32(63%)	-	-	-	0.11	11/16(69%)	50	4/7(57%)	-	-	-	-
Beks J. Goalkeeper	-	16/30(53%)	-	-	-	-	1/6(17%)	34	7/20(35%)	-	-	-	-

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Defending

Player	Duels	Aerial duels	Ground duels	Foules	Tackles	Interceptions	Clearances	Error leading to goal	Error leading to shot	Own goals
Emsis E. Midfielder	14	3/4(75%)	5/10(50%)	2	4/5(80%)	1	-	-	-	-
Beks J. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1

Goalkeeping

Player	Goals prevented	Goalkeeper saves	xGOT faced	Goals Conceded	Punches	Throws	Sweeper keeper actions
Beks J. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	1	-	3	-

Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.

xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.