Columbus Crew 2 - Inter Miami CF II 03.05.2026
- 03/05/26 18:00
-
- 3 : 1
- Finished
3.86
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
0.59
52
%
Ball possession
48
%
6
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
2
- 1.9
- Goals scored per match
- 1.2
- 2.1
- Goals conceded per match
- 2.8
- 24'
- Minutes/Goal scored
- 25.5'
Chat
Be the first to leave a comment
Predictions
As part of the MLS Next Pro (USA) tournament, the match between teams Columbus Crew 2 and Inter Miami CF II is scheduled. The game will start on 03.05 at 18:00. All sports bettors can follow in-depth Columbus Crew 2 Inter Miami CF II betting tips using the subsequent analysis of teams' statistics and prediction for the match.
3 / 10 of the last matches Columbus Crew 2 in all tournaments ended with its victory in the 1st half
3 / 10 of the last matches Columbus Crew 2 in MLS Next Pro ended with its victory in the 1st half
5 / 9 of the last matches between the teams ended with a victory Columbus Crew 2 in the 1st half
3 / 10 of the last matches Inter Miami CF II in MLS Next Pro ended with its defeat in the 1st half
4 / 10 of her last matches Columbus Crew 2 in all competitions ended in defeat
4 / 10 of last matches Columbus Crew 2 in MLS Next Pro ended in defeat
| # | Form MLS Next Pro 2026 | GP | W | D | L | G | GD | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 29:11 | 18 | 34 | |
| 2 | 16 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 29:25 | 4 | 32 | |
| 3 | 13 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 30:10 | 20 | 31 | |
| 29 | 15 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 12:32 | -20 | 6 | |
| 30 | 13 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 13:35 | -22 | 5 |
| # | Group Eastern | GP | W | D | L | G | GD | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 29:25 | 4 | 32 | |
| 2 | 14 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 37:18 | 19 | 30 | |
| 3 | 15 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 32:22 | 10 | 28 | |
| 14 | 16 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 19:28 | -9 | 14 | |
| 15 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 12:27 | -15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 13 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 13:35 | -22 | 5 |
Player Statistics
Overview
Shots
Attack
Defending
Goalkeeping
Overview
| Player | Grade | Minutes played | Goals | xG | Assists | xA | Total shots | Passes | Yellow cards | Red cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ruvalcaba C.
Defender
|
7.3 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 30/32(94%) | - | - |
|
Brown T.
Defender
|
7.1 | 76 | - | 0.23 | - | 0.04 | 2 | 37/42(88%) | - | - |
|
Adams C.
Forward
|
7 | 38 | 1 | 0.5 | - | 0.03 | 3 | 15/24(63%) | - | - |
|
Presthus O.
Defender
|
6.8 | 45 | - | 0.01 | - | - | 1 | 17/24(71%) | - | - |
|
Pruter L.
Goalkeeper
|
6.8 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 17/32(53%) | - | - |
|
Hall T.
Defender
|
6.5 | 64 | - | - | - | - | - | 17/20(85%) | - | - |
|
De Libera G.
Midfielder
|
6.2 | 14 | - | - | - | - | - | 4/4(100%) | - | - |
xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Shots
| Player | Total shots | Shots on target | xGOT | Shots off target | Blocked shots | Shots header | Shots inside the Box | Shots outside the Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adams C.
Forward
|
3 | 1 | 0.81 | 2 | - | - | 3 | - |
|
Brown T.
Defender
|
2 | 1 | 0.15 | - | 1 | - | 2 | - |
|
Presthus O.
Defender
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
|
De Libera G.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Hall T.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Pruter L.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Ruvalcaba C.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Attack
| Player | Touches in the opposition Box | Passes | Big chances created | Big chances missed | Assists | xA | Passes in final third | Touches | Passes long | Crosses | Successful dribbles | Fouled | Offsides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adams C.
Forward
|
4 | 15/24(63%) | - | 1 | - | 0.03 | 8/15(53%) | 35 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Brown T.
Defender
|
4 | 37/42(88%) | - | - | - | 0.04 | 11/13(85%) | 69 | 2/3(67%) | - | 1/1(100%) | 1 | - |
|
De Libera G.
Midfielder
|
- | 4/4(100%) | - | - | - | - | 1/1(100%) | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Hall T.
Defender
|
- | 17/20(85%) | - | - | - | - | - | 36 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Presthus O.
Defender
|
- | 17/24(71%) | - | - | - | - | 5/8(63%) | 45 | 3/8(38%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Pruter L.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 17/32(53%) | - | - | - | - | 3/11(27%) | 47 | 6/21(29%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Ruvalcaba C.
Defender
|
- | 30/32(94%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 2/4(50%) | 47 | 4/5(80%) | - | - | 1 | - |
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Defending
| Player | Duels | Aerial duels | Ground duels | Foules | Tackles | Interceptions | Clearances | Error leading to goal | Error leading to shot | Own goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adams C.
Forward
|
8 | 2/3(67%) | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Hall T.
Defender
|
8 | - | 4/6(67%) | 2 | 1/3(33%) | 4 | 6 | - | - | - |
|
Presthus O.
Defender
|
4 | 1/2(50%) | 2/2(100%) | - | 2/2(100%) | 2 | - | - | - | - |
|
Brown T.
Defender
|
3 | - | 2/3(67%) | 1 | - | 2 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
De Libera G.
Midfielder
|
3 | - | 1/2(50%) | - | 1/1(100%) | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Ruvalcaba C.
Defender
|
3 | 1/1(100%) | 1/2(50%) | - | - | 3 | 5 | - | - | - |
|
Pruter L.
Goalkeeper
|
1 | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Goalkeeping
| Player | Goals prevented | Goalkeeper saves | xGOT faced | Goals Conceded | Punches | Throws | Sweeper keeper actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pruter L.
Goalkeeper
|
-0.28 | 4 | 0.72 | 1 | - | 7 | - |
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
