• Football
• Leagues
• USA
• MLS
• D.C. United x Chicago Fire

D.C. United - Chicago Fire 13.05.2026

• 13/05/26 19:30
• D.C. United

  Baribo T. - 41'
  • 1 : 3
  • Finished
  Chicago Fire

  Lod R. - 62'

  Cuypers H. - 71'

  Haile-Selassie M. - 87'

Summary Lineups Player Statistics

DC

Match details

CHI

1st Half 1:0

19 D'avilla D.

41 Baribo T. Assist: Munteanu L.

2nd Half 0:3

48 Bamba J.

62 Lod R. Assist: Zinckernagel P.

63 Dithejane P. Out: Bamba J.

64 Haile-Selassie M. Out: Lod R.

64 Stroud J. Out: Baribo T.

71 Cuypers H.

75 Elliott J.

87 Haile-Selassie M.

88 Murrell J. Out: Hopkins J.

89 Dean J.

90 + 4 Mueller C. Out: Zinckernagel P.

90 + 4 Shokalook J. Out: Cuypers H.

90 + 7 Gutman A.

DC

Statistics

CHI

0.72

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

2.12

40 %

Ball possession

60 %

0

Big chances Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.

6

10 Matches

2 - Wins

4 - Draws

4 - Losses

10 Matches

2 - Wins

6 - Draws

2 - Losses

10 Matches

3 - Wins

5 - Draws

2 - Losses

10 Matches

Wins - 4

Draws - 0

Losses - 6

10 Matches

Wins - 4

Draws - 5

Losses - 1

10 Matches

Wins - 5

Draws - 1

Losses - 4

• 40% 4/10
• Both team to score
• 7/10 70%

• 42%
• Ball possession
• 57%

• 16 1.6
• Goals scored per match
• 19 1.9

• 11.38 1.14
• xG (Expected Goals) per match
• 18.09 1.81

• 17 1.7
• Goals conceded per match
• 15 1.5

• 9.79 0.98
• Expected goals conceded (xCG) per match
• 13.57 1.36

Full Stats

DC

H2H Stats

CHI

All tournaments MLS US Open Cup 5 matches 10 matches 15 matches All matches 5 matches 10 matches 15 matches All matches 5 matches

• 40% 2wins
• 20% 1draws
• 40% 2wins

More H2H

Chat

Be the first to leave a comment

Go to chat

Top Scorers

D.C. United

USA MLS

#

Goals

• 9 Baribo T.
  8
• 11 Munteanu L.
  5
• 25 Hopkins J.
  2
• 3 Bartlett L.
  2
• 4 Peltola M.
  1

Chicago Fire

USA MLS

#

Goals

• 9 Cuypers H.
  13
• 77 Zinckernagel P.
  5
• 17 Lod R.
  3
• 7 Haile-Selassie M.
  3
• 19 Bamba J.
  2

Show full top scorers

Match facts

The most common result of matches between DC United and Chicago Fire is 1-1. 9 matches have ended with this result.

During the last 35 meetings with DC United playing at home, DC United have won 15 times, there have been 9 draws while Chicago Fire have won 11 times. The goal difference is 59-53 in favour of DC United.

During the last 70 meetings, DC United have won 24 times, there have been 23 draws while Chicago Fire have won 23 times. The goal difference is 102-96 in favour of Chicago Fire.

Last season's matches: 1-7 (DC United at home) and 2-2 (Chicago Fire at home).

Did you know that DC United scores 33% of their goals between the minutes 76-90?

Did you know that Chicago Fire scores 30% of their goals between the minutes 76-90?

DC United haven't lost in their last 5 games.

Chicago Fire have lost none of their last 4 away matches.

DC United haven't scored in 1 of their 4 home matches in MLS this season.

Chicago Fire haven't scored in 1 of their 4 away matches in MLS this season.

Tai Baribo is DC United's top scorer with 6 goals. Hugo Jean-Marc Cuypers has scored 11 times for Chicago Fire.

Joao Gabriel Martins Peglow has assisted the most goals for DC United with 3. Philip Aksel Frigast Zinckernagel is Chicago Fire's biggest assister (4).

Chicago Fire have scored at least one goal for 10 consecutive matches.

DC United wins 1st half in 23% of their matches, Chicago Fire in 50% of their matches.

DC United wins 23% of halftimes, Chicago Fire wins 50%.

The winner of their last meeting was DC United.

On their last meeting DC United won by 1 goals.

When DC United leads 1-0 at home, they win in 60% of their matches.

When Chicago Fire leads 0-1 away, they win in 64% of their matches.

When DC United is down 0-1 home, they win 0% of their matches.

When Chicago Fire is down 1-0 away, they win 0% of their matches.

In MLS, Chicago Fire has better performance than DC United.

DC United's performance of the last 5 matches is better than Chicago Fire's.

DC United have lost just 1 of their last 5 games against Chicago Fire (in all competitions).

In the last 5 meetings DC United won 2, Chicago Fire won 1, 2 draws.

DC United have lost just 1 of their last 5 MLS games against Chicago Fire.

Chicago Fire have won just 1 of their last 5 MLS games against DC United.

DC United scores 1.6 goals in a match against Chicago Fire and Chicago Fire scores 2.4 goals against DC United (on average).

Average number of goals in meetings between DC United and Chicago Fire is 4.

Average number of goals in the first half in meetings between DC United and Chicago Fire is 1.8.

DC United scores 0.94 goals when playing at home and Chicago Fire scores 2.41 goals when playing away (on average).

Chicago Fire have lost 3 matches in a row.

In MLS, DC United has better performance than Chicago Fire.

Both teams haven't won their last match in MLS.

More facts

Predictions

As part of the MLS (USA) tournament, the match between teams D.C. United and Chicago Fire is scheduled. The game will start on 13.05 at 19:30. All sports bettors can follow in-depth D.C. United Chicago Fire betting tips using the subsequent analysis of teams' statistics and prediction for the match.

2 / 10 of her last matches D.C. United in all competitions ended in defeat

3 / 10 of last matches D.C. United in MLS ended in defeat

5 / 10 of last matches Chicago Fire in all tournaments ended with her victory

5 / 10 of last matches Chicago Fire in MLS ended with her victory

3 / 10 of last matches between the teams ended in victory Chicago Fire

8 / 10 of last matches in all competitions D.C. United did not lose

More predictions

DC

Line Up

CHI

4-4-2 4-3-3

Line Up

Starting

6.7 1 Johnson

27 Markovic 6.9 3 Bartlett 5.1 15 Rowles 5.7 6 Kurokawa

6.4 25 Hopkins 6.9 4 Peltola 6.3 23 Servania 6.7 7 Peglow

6.2 11 Munteanu 6.7 9 Baribo

6.9 1 Brady

24 Dean 6.8 3 Elliott 4 Mbokazi 6.9 15 Gutman

6.1 22 Pineda 6.8 42 D'avilla 7.4 17 Lod

7.4 11 Zinckernagel 7 9 Cuypers 6.1 19 Bamba

DC

Starting

CHI

Johnson S. Goalkeeper Markovic N. Defender Bartlett L. Defender Rowles K. Defender Kurokawa K. Defender Peltola M. Defender Hopkins J. 88' Murrell J. Servania B. Midfielder Peglow Forward Munteanu L. Forward Baribo T. 64' Stroud J.

Brady C. Goalkeeper Elliott J. Defender Mbokazi M. Defender Gutman A. Defender Pineda M. Defender D'avilla D. Defender Dean J. Midfielder Lod R. 64' Haile-Selassie M. Zinckernagel P. 90' Mueller C. Cuypers H. 90' Shokalook J. Bamba J. 63' Dithejane P.

DC

Substitutes

CHI

Farr J. Goalkeeper Bono A. Goalkeeper Antley W. Defender Herrera A. Defender Turner G. Midfielder Clark C. Midfielder Stroud J. 64' Out: Baribo T. Kijima H. Midfielder Murrell J. 88' Out: Hopkins J.

Cohen J. Goalkeeper Dithejane P. 63' Out: Bamba J. Waterman J. Defender Radojevic V. Defender Samuel Rogers Defender Borso D. Midfielder Haile-Selassie M. 64' Out: Lod R. Shokalook J. 90' Out: Cuypers H. Mueller C. 90' Out: Zinckernagel P.

DC

Head coach

CHI

Weiler R. Coaches

Berhalter G. Coaches

Player Statistics

Overall D.C. United Chicago Fire

Overview

Shots

Attack

Defending

Goalkeeping

Overview

Player	Grade	Minutes played	Goals	xG	Assists	xA	Total shots	Passes	Yellow cards	Red cards
Haile-Selassie M. Midfielder	7.4	27	1	0.14	-	0.03	1	13/16(81%)	-	-
Lod R. Midfielder	7.4	63	1	0.09	-	0.13	1	6/10(60%)	-	-
Zinckernagel P. Forward	7.4	89	-	1.05	1	0.32	6	24/32(75%)	-	-
Dithejane P. Defender	7.1	28	-	0.17	-	0.04	1	7/10(70%)	-	-
Cuypers H. Forward	7	89	1	0.41	-	0.02	1	10/15(67%)	-	-
Brady C. Goalkeeper	6.9	90	-	-	-	-	-	29/35(83%)	-	-
Gutman A. Defender	6.9	90	-	0.02	-	0.1	1	31/41(76%)	1	-
Peltola M. Defender	6.9	90	-	0.03	-	0.02	1	14/18(78%)	-	-
Bartlett L. Defender	6.9	90	-	0.05	-	-	1	30/46(65%)	-	-
D'avilla D. Defender	6.8	90	-	-	-	0.02	-	46/55(84%)	1	-
Elliott J. Defender	6.8	90	-	-	-	0.01	-	50/62(81%)	1	-
Baribo T. Forward	6.7	64	1	0.19	-	0.06	1	18/24(75%)	-	-
Johnson S. Goalkeeper	6.7	90	-	-	-	0.02	-	15/23(65%)	-	-
Peglow Forward	6.7	90	-	0.02	-	0.06	1	19/31(61%)	-	-
Stroud J. Midfielder	6.5	26	-	0.11	-	-	1	-	-	-
Hopkins J. Midfielder	6.4	87	-	0.12	-	0.02	2	18/21(86%)	-	-
Dean J. Midfielder	6.4	90	-	-	-	0.01	-	27/34(79%)	1	-
Servania B. Midfielder	6.3	90	-	0.01	-	0.01	1	22/33(67%)	-	-
Munteanu L. Forward	6.2	90	-	0.16	-	0.03	4	12/16(75%)	-	-
Bamba J. Forward	6.1	62	-	0.19	-	0.04	2	25/32(78%)	1	-
Pineda M. Defender	6.1	90	-	0.05	-	0.07	1	53/62(85%)	-	-
Kurokawa K. Defender	5.7	90	-	-	-	0.08	-	19/27(70%)	-	-
Rowles K. Defender	5.1	90	-	-	-	-	-	25/37(68%)	-	-
Mueller C. Forward	-	1	-	-	-	0.01	-	1/1(100%)	-	-
Murrell J. Forward	-	3	-	-	-	-	-	1/1(100%)	-	-
Shokalook J. Forward	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Shots

Player	Total shots	Shots on target	xGOT	Shots off target	Blocked shots	Shots header	Shots inside the Box	Shots outside the Box
Zinckernagel P. Forward	6	3	1.03	2	1	-	5	1
Munteanu L. Forward	4	3	0.3	-	1	-	2	2
Bamba J. Forward	2	-	-	2	-	1	1	1
Hopkins J. Midfielder	2	1	0.27	1	-	-	1	1
Baribo T. Forward	1	1	0.48	-	-	-	1	-
Bartlett L. Defender	1	-	-	1	-	-	1	-
Cuypers H. Forward	1	1	0.96	1	-	-	1	-
Dithejane P. Defender	1	1	0.26	-	-	-	-	1
Gutman A. Defender	1	1	0.04	-	-	-	-	1
Haile-Selassie M. Midfielder	1	1	0.51	-	-	-	1	-
Lod R. Midfielder	1	1	0.11	-	-	1	1	-
Peglow Forward	1	-	-	1	-	-	-	1
Peltola M. Defender	1	-	-	-	1	-	1	-
Pineda M. Defender	1	-	-	1	-	1	1	-
Servania B. Midfielder	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	1
Stroud J. Midfielder	1	1	0.14	-	-	-	1	-
Brady C. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
D'avilla D. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Dean J. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Elliott J. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Johnson S. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Kurokawa K. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Mueller C. Forward	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Murrell J. Forward	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Rowles K. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Shokalook J. Forward	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.

Attack

Player	Touches in the opposition Box	Passes	Big chances created	Big chances missed	Assists	xA	Passes in final third	Touches	Passes long	Crosses	Successful dribbles	Fouled	Offsides
Zinckernagel P. Forward	10	24/32(75%)	1	1	1	0.32	15/21(71%)	61	2/4(50%)	3/11(27%)	2/3(67%)	3	-
Munteanu L. Forward	6	12/16(75%)	-	-	-	0.03	6/8(75%)	30	1/1(100%)	-	-	3	-
Bartlett L. Defender	4	30/46(65%)	-	-	-	-	3/11(27%)	58	3/11(27%)	-	-	-	-
Cuypers H. Forward	4	10/15(67%)	-	-	-	0.02	5/8(63%)	34	-	-	-	1	1
Dithejane P. Defender	4	7/10(70%)	-	1	-	0.04	3/5(60%)	16	-	1/1(100%)	-	1	-
Bamba J. Forward	3	25/32(78%)	-	1	-	0.04	8/13(62%)	50	-	1/1(100%)	-	-	-
Baribo T. Forward	3	18/24(75%)	-	-	-	0.06	3/7(43%)	33	-	-	1/2(50%)	2	-
Kurokawa K. Defender	3	19/27(70%)	-	-	-	0.08	6/9(67%)	50	-	2/8(25%)	1/2(50%)	-	-
Lod R. Midfielder	3	6/10(60%)	-	-	-	0.13	2/3(67%)	19	-	-	-	1	1
Peglow Forward	3	19/31(61%)	-	-	-	0.06	7/12(58%)	56	-	1/5(20%)	1/2(50%)	2	-
Haile-Selassie M. Midfielder	2	13/16(81%)	1	-	-	0.03	8/10(80%)	18	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	1
Peltola M. Defender	2	14/18(78%)	-	-	-	0.02	6/9(67%)	39	4/6(67%)	-	-	1	-
Dean J. Midfielder	1	27/34(79%)	-	-	-	0.01	7/10(70%)	56	-	-	1/3(33%)	-	-
Gutman A. Defender	1	31/41(76%)	-	-	-	0.1	14/18(78%)	72	1/2(50%)	1/2(50%)	-	1	-
Hopkins J. Midfielder	1	18/21(86%)	-	-	-	0.02	7/9(78%)	31	2/2(100%)	-	-	-	-
Pineda M. Defender	1	53/62(85%)	-	1	-	0.07	11/13(85%)	82	3/6(50%)	-	1/1(100%)	2	-
Rowles K. Defender	1	25/37(68%)	-	-	-	-	-	47	1/7(14%)	-	-	1	-
Shokalook J. Forward	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	-	-
Stroud J. Midfielder	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	-	1
Brady C. Goalkeeper	-	29/35(83%)	-	-	-	-	-	49	2/8(25%)	-	-	-	-
D'avilla D. Defender	-	46/55(84%)	-	-	-	0.02	7/9(78%)	72	3/6(50%)	-	2/3(67%)	3	-
Elliott J. Defender	-	50/62(81%)	-	-	-	0.01	2/7(29%)	74	1/7(20%)	-	-	-	1
Johnson S. Goalkeeper	-	15/23(65%)	-	-	-	0.02	1/5(20%)	34	2/10(20%)	-	-	-	-
Mueller C. Forward	-	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	0.01	1/1(100%)	2	-	-	-	-	-
Murrell J. Forward	-	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	-	-
Servania B. Midfielder	-	22/33(67%)	-	-	-	0.01	5/9(56%)	47	1/2(50%)	-	-	2	-

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Defending

Player	Duels	Aerial duels	Ground duels	Foules	Tackles	Interceptions	Clearances	Error leading to goal	Error leading to shot	Own goals
Peltola M. Defender	14	-	8/14(57%)	5	3/7(43%)	3	2	-	-	-
Servania B. Midfielder	13	3/3(100%)	6/10(60%)	1	3/4(75%)	1	1	-	-	-
D'avilla D. Defender	12	1/2(50%)	6/10(60%)	1	1/1(100%)	1	1	-	-	-
Baribo T. Forward	11	3/5(60%)	4/6(67%)	1	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-
Cuypers H. Forward	11	2/5(40%)	2/6(33%)	3	1/1(100%)	-	3	-	-	-
Pineda M. Defender	11	-	3/8(38%)	2	-	-	2	-	-	-
Munteanu L. Forward	10	-	3/6(50%)	2	-	-	1	-	-	-
Zinckernagel P. Forward	10	-	6/10(60%)	1	-	1	1	-	-	-
Bartlett L. Defender	9	4/4(100%)	2/5(40%)	1	1/2(50%)	1	3	-	-	-
Dean J. Midfielder	9	1/2(50%)	2/7(29%)	1	1/1(100%)	2	3	-	-	-
Gutman A. Defender	9	1/3(33%)	3/6(50%)	1	1/2(50%)	2	8	-	-	-
Peglow Forward	9	-	6/9(67%)	1	1/3(25%)	-	1	-	-	-
Bamba J. Forward	7	1/1(100%)	1/6(17%)	1	1/1(100%)	-	3	-	-	-
Elliott J. Defender	7	4/6(67%)	-	1	-	-	10	-	-	-
Rowles K. Defender	7	3/6(50%)	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Lod R. Midfielder	6	1/1(100%)	2/5(40%)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hopkins J. Midfielder	5	-	2/4(50%)	1	-	-	-	-	-	-
Dithejane P. Defender	2	-	1/2(50%)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Kurokawa K. Defender	2	-	1/2(50%)	-	-	4	1	-	-	-
Shokalook J. Forward	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Brady C. Goalkeeper	1	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Mueller C. Forward	1	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-
Haile-Selassie M. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Johnson S. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Murrell J. Forward	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Stroud J. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-

Goalkeeping

Player	Goals prevented	Goalkeeper saves	xGOT faced	Goals Conceded	Punches	Throws	Sweeper keeper actions
Brady C. Goalkeeper	0.19	5	1.19	1	2	4	-
Johnson S. Goalkeeper	-0.09	5	2.91	3	-	5	-

Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.

xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.