Esbjerg fB - Horsens 30.04.2026
-
30/04/26
13:00
|
Round 28
-
- 0 : 1
- Finished
1.64
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
0.26
56
%
Ball possession
44
%
0
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
1
- 0.9
- Goals scored per match
- 0.9
- 1.6
- Goals conceded per match
- 1.1
- 36'
- Minutes/Goal scored
- 45'
Chat
Be the first to leave a comment
Match facts
The most common result of matches between Esbjerg FB and AC Horsens when Esbjerg FB is playing at home is 0-1. 5 matches have ended with this result.
During the last 25 meetings with Esbjerg FB playing at home, Esbjerg FB have won 9 times, there have been 7 draws while AC Horsens have won 9 times. The goal difference is 24-21 in favour of Esbjerg FB.
During the last 53 meetings, Esbjerg FB have won 16 times, there have been 16 draws while AC Horsens have won 21 times. The goal difference is 65-61 in favour of Esbjerg FB.
Last season AC Horsens won both games against Esbjerg FB (3-2 at home and 1-0 away).
Predictions
As part of the 1. Division (Denmark) tournament, the match between teams Esbjerg fB and Horsens is scheduled. The game will start on 30.04 at 13:00. All sports bettors can follow in-depth Esbjerg fB Horsens betting tips using the subsequent analysis of teams' statistics and prediction for the match.
3 / 10 of her last matches Esbjerg fB in all competitions ended in defeat
2 / 10 of last matches Esbjerg fB in 1. Division ended in defeat
7 / 10 of the last matches between the teams ended in a victory Esbjerg fB
7 / 10 of last matches in all competitions Horsens did not lose
7 / 10 of last matches in 1. Division Horsens did not lose
6 / 10 of last matches in all competitions Esbjerg fB did not draw
| # | Group 1. Division | GP | W | D | L | G | GD | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 22 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 33:29 | 4 | 37 | |
| 4 | 22 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 32:29 | 3 | 37 | |
| 5 | 22 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 29:23 | 6 | 33 | |
| 6 | 22 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 26:24 | 2 | 30 | |
| 7 | 22 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 33:31 | 2 | 28 |
| # | Group Promotion Round | GP | W | D | L | G | GD | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32 | 18 | 6 | 8 | 69:36 | 33 | 60 | |
| 2 | 32 | 15 | 9 | 8 | 42:27 | 15 | 54 | |
| 3 | 32 | 15 | 7 | 10 | 45:43 | 2 | 52 | |
| 4 | 32 | 13 | 11 | 8 | 42:43 | -1 | 50 | |
| 5 | 32 | 11 | 13 | 8 | 43:39 | 4 | 46 |
Player Statistics
Overview
Shots
Attack
Defending
Goalkeeping
Overview
| Player | Grade | Minutes played | Goals | xG | Assists | xA | Total shots | Passes | Yellow cards | Red cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Palsson V.
Defender
|
7.5 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.03 | - | 38/50(76%) | - | - |
Kirkegaard K.
Forward
|
7.2 | 63 | - | - | - | 0.21 | - | 18/26(69%) | - | - |
|
Saine A.
Defender
|
7.1 | 27 | - | 0.03 | - | 0.04 | 1 | 9/11(82%) | - | - |
|
Delac M.
Goalkeeper
|
7 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 11/27(41%) | - | - |
|
Kolawole J.
Forward
|
6.8 | 19 | - | 0.06 | - | 0.04 | 1 | 13/16(81%) | - | - |
|
Brajanac M.
Forward
|
6.7 | 90 | - | 0.27 | - | 0.01 | 3 | 11/12(92%) | - | - |
|
Christensen L.
Midfielder
|
6.7 | 71 | - | 0.06 | - | 0.03 | 1 | 47/55(85%) | - | - |
|
Tjornelund P.
Defender
|
6.7 | 90 | - | 0.12 | - | 0.21 | 1 | 47/54(87%) | - | - |
|
Ammitzboll A.
Forward
|
6.6 | 19 | - | - | - | 0.02 | - | 2/4(50%) | - | - |
|
Skipper A.
Defender
|
6.5 | 78 | - | 0.18 | - | 0.01 | 1 | 57/67(85%) | - | - |
|
McCrorie R.
Goalkeeper
|
6.1 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 11/14(79%) | - | - |
|
Maden M.
Midfielder
|
5.6 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 30/36(83%) | - | - |
Brandhof F.
Midfielder
|
- | 9 | - | - | - | - | - | 2/4(50%) | - | - |
|
Lucena J.
|
- | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | 2/3(67%) | 1 | - |
xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Shots
| Player | Total shots | Shots on target | xGOT | Shots off target | Blocked shots | Shots header | Shots inside the Box | Shots outside the Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Brajanac M.
Forward
|
3 | 1 | 0.14 | - | 2 | - | 3 | - |
|
Christensen L.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - |
|
Kolawole J.
Forward
|
1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 |
|
Saine A.
Defender
|
1 | 1 | 0.16 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Skipper A.
Defender
|
1 | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | - |
|
Tjornelund P.
Defender
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | - |
|
Ammitzboll A.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Brandhof F.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Delac M.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Kirkegaard K.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Lucena J.
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Maden M.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
McCrorie R.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Palsson V.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Attack
| Player | Touches in the opposition Box | Passes | Big chances created | Big chances missed | Assists | xA | Passes in final third | Touches | Passes long | Crosses | Successful dribbles | Fouled | Offsides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kirkegaard K.
Forward
|
4 | 18/26(69%) | 1 | - | - | 0.21 | 9/15(60%) | 35 | - | - | 1/4(25%) | 1 | 1 |
|
Ammitzboll A.
Forward
|
3 | 2/4(50%) | - | - | - | 0.02 | 1/3(33%) | 11 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Brajanac M.
Forward
|
3 | 11/12(92%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 4/4(100%) | 24 | - | - | 1/1(100%) | 1 | 1 |
|
Tjornelund P.
Defender
|
3 | 47/54(87%) | - | - | - | 0.21 | 14/18(78%) | 67 | 3/5(60%) | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Christensen L.
Midfielder
|
2 | 47/55(85%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 13/17(76%) | 67 | 4/7(57%) | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - |
|
Maden M.
Midfielder
|
2 | 30/36(83%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 2/6(33%) | 44 | - | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Saine A.
Defender
|
2 | 9/11(82%) | - | - | - | 0.04 | 4/4(100%) | 14 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Kolawole J.
Forward
|
1 | 13/16(81%) | - | - | - | 0.04 | 4/6(67%) | 28 | - | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Skipper A.
Defender
|
1 | 57/67(85%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 5/8(63%) | 82 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Brandhof F.
Midfielder
|
- | 2/4(50%) | - | - | - | - | 2/3(67%) | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Delac M.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 11/27(41%) | - | - | - | - | 1/5(20%) | 38 | 7/23(30%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Lucena J.
|
- | 2/3(67%) | - | - | - | - | 1/2(50%) | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
McCrorie R.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 11/14(79%) | - | - | - | - | - | 19 | 1/4(25%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Palsson V.
Defender
|
- | 38/50(76%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 14/20(70%) | 77 | 3/4(75%) | - | 1/1(100%) | 1 | - |
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Defending
| Player | Duels | Aerial duels | Ground duels | Foules | Tackles | Interceptions | Clearances | Error leading to goal | Error leading to shot | Own goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Palsson V.
Defender
|
10 | 3/5(60%) | 3/5(60%) | 1 | 1/1(100%) | 2 | 11 | - | - | - |
|
Tjornelund P.
Defender
|
9 | 2/4(50%) | 3/5(60%) | - | 1/3(33%) | 4 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Christensen L.
Midfielder
|
7 | - | 4/6(67%) | 1 | 1/3(33%) | 2 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Kirkegaard K.
Forward
|
7 | - | 3/7(43%) | - | 1/1(100%) | 1 | - | - | - | - |
|
Kolawole J.
Forward
|
6 | - | 5/6(83%) | - | 3/3(100%) | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Maden M.
Midfielder
|
6 | - | 2/6(33%) | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Ammitzboll A.
Forward
|
5 | 1/4(25%) | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - |
|
Brajanac M.
Forward
|
4 | 3/3(100%) | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Saine A.
Defender
|
4 | 1/2(50%) | 2/2(100%) | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Skipper A.
Defender
|
4 | 1/3(33%) | 1/1(100%) | - | 1/1(100%) | 3 | 3 | - | - | 1 |
|
Lucena J.
|
3 | 1/1(100%) | - | 2 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Delac M.
Goalkeeper
|
1 | 1/1(100%) | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Brandhof F.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
McCrorie R.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Goalkeeping
| Player | Goals prevented | Goalkeeper saves | xGOT faced | Goals Conceded | Punches | Throws | Sweeper keeper actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delac M.
Goalkeeper
|
0.2 | 2 | 0.2 | - | 2 | 3 | 1 |
|
McCrorie R.
Goalkeeper
|
0.16 | 1 | 0.16 | 1 | - | 4 | - |
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
