FC Cincinnati 2 - New England Revolution II 07.06.2026
Next match FC Cincinnati 2 - New England Revolution II on 26/07/2026
- 07/06/26 18:00
-
- 0 : 1
- Finished
1st Half
0:0
2nd Half
0:1
0.21
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
1.35
32
%
Ball possession
68
%
0
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
1
10
Matches
3 - Wins
0 - Draws
7 - Losses
10
Matches
Wins - 5
Draws - 3
Losses - 2
-
30% 3/10
- Both team to score
-
4/10 40%
- 39%
- Ball possession
-
50%
- 11 1.1
- Goals scored per match
- 13 1.3
- 6.09 0.61
- xG (Expected Goals) per match
- 7.7 0.77
- 18 1.8
- Goals conceded per match
- 9 0.9
- 10 1.00
- Expected goals conceded (xCG) per match
- 5.68 0.57
Chat
Be the first to leave a comment
Predictions
As part of the MLS Next Pro (USA) tournament, the match between teams FC Cincinnati 2 and New England Revolution II is scheduled. The game will start on 07.06 at 18:00. All sports bettors can follow in-depth FC Cincinnati 2 New England Revolution II betting tips using the subsequent analysis of teams' statistics and prediction for the match.
7 / 10 of her last matches FC Cincinnati 2 in all competitions ended in defeat
7 / 10 of last matches FC Cincinnati 2 in MLS Next Pro ended in defeat
5 / 10 of last matches New England Revolution II in all tournaments ended with her victory
5 / 10 of last matches New England Revolution II in MLS Next Pro ended with her victory
3 / 10 of last matches between the teams ended in victory New England Revolution II
6 / 10 of last matches FC Cincinnati 2 in all competitions, at least one team did not score
| # | Form MLS Next Pro 2026 | GP | W | D | L | G | GD | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 15 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 34:28 | 6 | 28 | |
| 9 | 14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 18:13 | 5 | 28 | |
| 10 | 15 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 30:26 | 4 | 26 | |
| 27 | 17 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 22:44 | -22 | 13 | |
| 28 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 12:27 | -15 | 9 | |
| 29 | 15 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 12:32 | -20 | 6 |
| # | Group Eastern | GP | W | D | L | G | GD | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 15 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 34:28 | 6 | 28 | |
| 5 | 14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 18:13 | 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | 15 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 30:26 | 4 | 26 | |
| 14 | 16 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 19:28 | -9 | 14 | |
| 15 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 12:27 | -15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 13 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 13:35 | -22 | 5 |
Player Statistics
Overview
Shots
Attack
Defending
Goalkeeping
Overview
| Player | Grade | Minutes played | Goals | xG | Assists | xA | Total shots | Passes | Yellow cards | Red cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Christopher Dahlin G.
Defender
|
7.4 | 90 | - | - | 1 | 0.09 | - | 67/75(89%) | - | - |
|
Da J.
Forward
|
7.2 | 76 | - | 0.38 | - | 0.56 | 3 | 19/28(68%) | 1 | - |
|
Weinstein M.
Goalkeeper
|
7 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 10/14(71%) | - | - |
|
Fletcher K.
Forward
|
6.2 | 45 | - | 0.04 | - | 0.02 | 1 | 11/17(65%) | - | - |
|
George S.
Midfielder
|
6.1 | 14 | - | 0.06 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Sullivan M.
Midfielder
|
5.4 | 90 | - | 0.02 | - | 0.04 | 1 | 9/13(69%) | - | - |
xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Shots
| Player | Total shots | Shots on target | xGOT | Shots off target | Blocked shots | Shots header | Shots inside the Box | Shots outside the Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Da J.
Forward
|
3 | 2 | 0.82 | 1 | - | - | 3 | - |
|
Fletcher K.
Forward
|
1 | 1 | 0.05 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
|
George S.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | - |
|
Sullivan M.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | - |
|
Christopher Dahlin G.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Weinstein M.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Attack
| Player | Touches in the opposition Box | Passes | Big chances created | Big chances missed | Assists | xA | Passes in final third | Touches | Passes long | Crosses | Successful dribbles | Fouled | Offsides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Da J.
Forward
|
9 | 19/28(68%) | - | 1 | - | 0.56 | 14/20(70%) | 44 | 2/3(67%) | - | 2/2(100%) | 1 | 1 |
|
Fletcher K.
Forward
|
3 | 11/17(65%) | - | - | - | 0.02 | 4/8(50%) | 29 | 4/5(80%) | - | 2/5(40%) | 1 | - |
|
George S.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Sullivan M.
Midfielder
|
1 | 9/13(69%) | - | - | - | 0.04 | 2/3(67%) | 24 | 1/4(25%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Christopher Dahlin G.
Defender
|
- | 67/75(89%) | - | - | 1 | 0.09 | 15/19(79%) | 93 | 3/4(75%) | - | 2/2(100%) | 3 | - |
|
Weinstein M.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 10/14(71%) | - | - | - | - | 1/1(100%) | 23 | 4/8(50%) | - | - | 1 | - |
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Defending
| Player | Duels | Aerial duels | Ground duels | Foules | Tackles | Interceptions | Clearances | Error leading to goal | Error leading to shot | Own goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Christopher Dahlin G.
Defender
|
13 | 1/4(25%) | 7/9(78%) | - | 1/2(50%) | 1 | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Da J.
Forward
|
11 | 4/5(80%) | 3/6(50%) | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Fletcher K.
Forward
|
9 | - | 3/8(38%) | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Sullivan M.
Midfielder
|
3 | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | - | - |
|
George S.
Midfielder
|
1 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Weinstein M.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Goalkeeping
| Player | Goals prevented | Goalkeeper saves | xGOT faced | Goals Conceded | Punches | Throws | Sweeper keeper actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Weinstein M.
Goalkeeper
|
0.12 | 2 | 0.12 | - | - | 5 | - |
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
