• Football
• Leagues
• Latvia
• Virsliga
• Rigas Futbola Skola x Riga FC

Rigas Futbola Skola - Riga FC 28.04.2026

• 28/04/26 13:00 |
  Round 9
• Rigas Futbola Skola

  Ikaunieks J. - 13'

  Diomande I. - 16'

  Zelenkovs D. - 65'
  • 3 : 3
  • Finished
  Riga FC

  Varslavans R. - 38'

  Badamosi M. - 63'

  Martins C. - 87'

Summary Player Statistics

RFS

Match details

RFC

1st Half 2:1

13 Ikaunieks J.

16 Diomande I.

38 Varslavans R.

2nd Half 1:2

63 Badamosi M.

65 Zelenkovs D.

87 Martins C.

RFS

Statistics

RFC

1

Yellow cards

1

• 2.4 2.2 1.7
• Goals scored per match
• 2.9 2.2 3.4

• 1 1.1 0.5
• Goals conceded per match
• 1.2 0.7 1.2

• 26.5' 27.3' 40.9'
• Minutes/Goal scored
• 22' 31' 19.6'

Full Stats

RFS

H2H Stats

RFC

All tournaments Virsliga 1.Liga Latvijas Kauss Superkauss 5 matches 10 matches 15 matches All matches 5 matches 10 matches 15 matches All matches 5 matches 5 matches 5 matches

• 20% 1wins
• 40% 2draws
• 40% 2wins

More H2H

Chat

Be the first to leave a comment

Go to chat

Top Scorers

Rigas Futbola Skola

Latvia Virsliga

#

Goals

• 10 Ikaunieks J.
  5
• 26 Panic S.
  5
• 22 Lemajic D.
  5
• 43 Lipuscek Z.
  2
• 7 Diomande I.
  2

Riga FC

Latvia Virsliga

#

Goals

• 15 Badamosi M.
  9
• 8 Siqueira I.
  6
• 10 Ramires R.
  5
• 56 Oulad M Hand S.
  4
• 13 Eduardo P.
  3

Show full top scorers

Match facts

The most common result of matches between FC RFS and Riga FC when FC RFS is playing at home is 0-0. 5 matches have ended with this result.

The most common result of matches between FC RFS and Riga FC is 1-1. 8 matches have ended with this result.

During the last 25 meetings with FC RFS playing at home, FC RFS have won 8 times, there have been 10 draws while Riga FC have won 7 times. The goal difference is 31-25 in favour of FC RFS.

During the last 47 meetings, FC RFS have won 16 times, there have been 17 draws while Riga FC have won 14 times. The goal difference is 57-51 in favour of FC RFS.

FC RFS have a winning streak of 4 matches in Virsliga.

Did you know that FC RFS scores 25% of their goals between the minutes 61-75?

Did you know that Riga FC scores 24% of their goals between the minutes 31-45?

FC RFS have a winning streak of 4 matches.

Riga FC haven't lost in their last 7 games.

Riga FC have a winning streak of 4 matches away from home.

FC RFS haven't scored in 1 of their 4 home matches in Virsliga this season.

Riga FC haven't scored in 0 of their 5 away matches in Virsliga this season.

Riga FC have scored at least one goal for 14 consecutive matches.

FC RFS wins 1st half in 44% of their matches, Riga FC in 59% of their matches.

FC RFS wins 44% of halftimes, Riga FC wins 59%.

The winner of their last meeting was FC RFS.

On their last meeting FC RFS won by 1 goals.

When FC RFS leads 1-0 at home, they win in 100% of their matches.

When Riga FC leads 0-1 away, they win in 88% of their matches.

When FC RFS is down 0-1 home, they win 16% of their matches.

When Riga FC is down 1-0 away, they win 33% of their matches.

In Virsliga, Riga FC has better performance than FC RFS.

Riga FC's performance of the last 5 matches is better than FC RFS's.

In the last 5 meetings FC RFS won 2, Riga FC won 2, 1 draws.

Riga FC have lost just 1 of their last 5 Virsliga games against FC RFS.

FC RFS have won just 1 of their last 5 Virsliga games against Riga FC.

FC RFS scores 1.6 goals in a match against Riga FC and Riga FC scores 1.6 goals against FC RFS (on average).

Average number of goals in meetings between FC RFS and Riga FC is 3.2.

Average number of goals in the first half in meetings between FC RFS and Riga FC is 0.6.

Both teams didn't concede on their last match.

FC RFS scores 2.76 goals when playing at home and Riga FC scores 2.5 goals when playing away (on average).

Did you know that FC RFS scores 31% of their goals between the minutes 61-75? This is the highest percentage in the league.

Riga FC have a winning streak of 3 matches in Virsliga.

Riga FC have a winning streak of 3 matches.

Darko Lemajic is FC RFS's top scorer with 4 goals. Muhammed Cray Badamosi has scored 6 times for Riga FC.

More facts

Predictions

As part of the Virsliga (Latvia) tournament, the match between teams Rigas Futbola Skola and Riga FC is scheduled. The game will start on 28.04 at 13:00. All sports bettors can follow in-depth Rigas Futbola Skola Riga FC betting tips using the subsequent analysis of teams' statistics and prediction for the match.

7 / 10 of last matches Rigas Futbola Skola in all competitions, at least one team did not score

6 / 10 of last matches Rigas Futbola Skola in Virsliga, at least one team has not scored

3 / 10 of the last matches between the teams, at least one of the teams did not score

3 / 10 of last matches Riga FC in all competitions, at least one team did not score

3 / 10 of last matches Riga FC in Virsliga, at least one team has not scored

1 / 10 of her last matches Rigas Futbola Skola in all competitions ended in defeat

More predictions

RFS

Standings

RFC

Latvia Virsliga

#	Team	GP	W	D	L	G	GD	P
1	Rigas Futbola Skola	16	14	1	1	38:11	27	43
2	Riga FC	16	12	3	1	50:17	33	39
3	Auda	16	11	1	4	32:20	12	34
4	Liepaja	17	7	4	6	23:24	-1	25

Full Standings

Player Statistics

Overall Rigas Futbola Skola Riga FC

Overview

Shots

Attack

Defending

Goalkeeping

Overview

Player	Grade	Minutes played	Goals	xG	Assists	xA	Total shots	Passes	Yellow cards	Red cards
Savalnieks R. Midfielder	7.9	90	-	0.06	2	0.1	1	19/31(61%)	1	-
Ikaunieks J. Midfielder	7.6	90	1	0.6	1	0.02	3	25/32(78%)	-	-
Zelenkovs D. Midfielder	7.4	90	1	0.02	-	0.16	1	26/36(72%)	-	-
Galo O. Midfielder	6.8	90	-	0.23	1	0.03	1	40/50(80%)	-	-
Varslavans R. Midfielder	6.7	81	1	0.17	-	0.01	1	29/39(74%)	-	-
Jurkovskis R. Defender	6	90	-	-	-	0.01	-	25/36(69%)	-	-
Maric M. Goalkeeper	5.2	90	-	-	-	-	-	6/15(40%)	-	-
Cernomordijs A. Defender	5.1	90	-	-	-	-	-	46/55(84%)	1	-
Zviedris K. Goalkeeper	4.5	90	-	-	-	0.01	-	8/13(62%)	-	-
Mankenda G. Forward	-	4	-	-	-	0.01	-	2/2(100%)	-	-

xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Shots

Player	Total shots	Shots on target	xGOT	Shots off target	Blocked shots	Shots header	Shots inside the Box	Shots outside the Box
Ikaunieks J. Midfielder	3	1	0.34	2	-	-	3	-
Galo O. Midfielder	1	1	0.18	-	-	-	1	-
Savalnieks R. Midfielder	1	-	-	1	-	-	1	-
Varslavans R. Midfielder	1	1	0.62	-	-	-	1	-
Zelenkovs D. Midfielder	1	1	0.11	-	-	-	-	1
Cernomordijs A. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Jurkovskis R. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Mankenda G. Forward	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Maric M. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Zviedris K. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.

Attack

Player	Touches in the opposition Box	Passes	Big chances created	Big chances missed	Assists	xA	Passes in final third	Touches	Passes long	Crosses	Successful dribbles	Fouled	Offsides
Ikaunieks J. Midfielder	6	25/32(78%)	1	-	1	0.02	11/16(69%)	54	-	-	1/1(100%)	1	-
Galo O. Midfielder	1	40/50(80%)	-	-	1	0.03	7/12(58%)	83	4/7(57%)	-	-	7	-
Savalnieks R. Midfielder	1	19/31(61%)	1	-	2	0.1	8/15(53%)	60	1/5(20%)	4/8(50%)	1/2(50%)	2	-
Varslavans R. Midfielder	1	29/39(74%)	-	-	-	0.01	4/9(44%)	49	-	-	-	1	-
Zelenkovs D. Midfielder	1	26/36(72%)	-	-	-	0.16	11/16(69%)	60	1/5(20%)	1/3(33%)	1/1(100%)	1	-
Cernomordijs A. Defender	-	46/55(84%)	-	-	-	-	1/4(25%)	62	2/7(29%)	-	-	2	-
Jurkovskis R. Defender	-	25/36(69%)	-	-	-	0.01	4/9(44%)	59	1/5(20%)	-	-	-	-
Mankenda G. Forward	-	2/2(100%)	-	-	-	0.01	1/1(100%)	3	-	-	-	-	-
Maric M. Goalkeeper	-	6/15(40%)	-	-	-	-	-	21	4/13(31%)	-	-	-	-
Zviedris K. Goalkeeper	-	8/13(62%)	-	-	-	0.01	1/2(50%)	20	1/5(20%)	-	-	1	-

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Defending

Player	Duels	Aerial duels	Ground duels	Foules	Tackles	Interceptions	Clearances	Error leading to goal	Error leading to shot	Own goals
Galo O. Midfielder	16	-	7/14(50%)	5	-	-	-	-	-	-
Ikaunieks J. Midfielder	14	-	4/12(33%)	6	2/2(100%)	1	1	-	-	-
Savalnieks R. Midfielder	14	1/3(33%)	5/11(45%)	4	1/2(50%)	-	3	-	-	-
Jurkovskis R. Defender	8	1/1(100%)	2/7(29%)	1	1/2(50%)	1	-	-	-	-
Cernomordijs A. Defender	7	2/2(100%)	2/5(40%)	2	-	-	2	-	-	-
Varslavans R. Midfielder	5	-	2/4(50%)	-	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-
Zelenkovs D. Midfielder	3	-	3/3(100%)	-	-	1	2	-	-	-
Mankenda G. Forward	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Zviedris K. Goalkeeper	1	1/1(100%)	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Maric M. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-

Goalkeeping

Player	Goals prevented	Goalkeeper saves	xGOT faced	Goals Conceded	Punches	Throws	Sweeper keeper actions
Maric M. Goalkeeper	-1.69	3	1.31	3	-	2	-
Zviedris K. Goalkeeper	-2.42	1	0.58	3	-	4	-

Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.

xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.