FC Supra Du Quebec - Cavalry 03.05.2026
Next match FC Supra Du Quebec - Cavalry on 08/08/2026
-
03/05/26
15:00
|
Round 1
-
- 0 : 1
- Finished
1st Half
0:0
39
Cavalry
2nd Half
0:1
68
Cavalry
68
Cavalry
84
Cavalry
88
Cavalry
90 + 1
Cavalry
90 + 1
Cavalry
90 + 6
FC Supra Du Quebec
90 + 6
FC Supra Du Quebec
90 + 13
FC Supra Du Quebec
0.43
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
1.09
51
%
Ball possession
49
%
1
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
1
- 1.7
- Goals scored per match
- 1.8
- 1.3
- Goals conceded per match
- 1.2
- 30'
- Minutes/Goal scored
- 31'
Chat
Be the first to leave a comment
Predictions
As part of the Canadian Premier League (Canada) tournament, the match between teams FC Supra Du Quebec and Cavalry is scheduled. The game will start on 03.05 at 15:00. All sports bettors can follow in-depth FC Supra Du Quebec Cavalry betting tips using the subsequent analysis of teams' statistics and prediction for the match.
6 / 10 of last matches Cavalry in all competitions ended in a draw
6 / 10 of last matches Cavalry in Canadian Premier League ended in a draw
1 / 3 of the last matches FC Supra Du Quebec in all tournaments ended with a loss in the 2nd half
1 / 3 of the last matches FC Supra Du Quebec in Canadian Premier League ended with its defeat in the 2nd half
4 / 10 of the last matches Cavalry in all tournaments ended with its victory in the 2nd half
4 / 10 of the last matches Cavalry in Canadian Premier League ended with its victory in the 2nd half
| # | Team | GP | W | D | L | G | GD | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 15:4 | 11 | 25 | |
| 2 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 19:5 | 14 | 23 | |
| 3 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 15:18 | -3 | 14 | |
| 5 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 13:17 | -4 | 12 | |
| 6 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 13:14 | -1 | 11 | |
| 7 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 9:11 | -2 | 11 |
Player Statistics
Overview
Shots
Attack
Defending
Goalkeeping
Overview
| Player | Grade | Minutes played | Goals | xG | Assists | xA | Total shots | Passes | Yellow cards | Red cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rea S.
Midfielder
|
7.4 | 90 | - | 0.3 | - | 0.11 | 4 | 34/44(77%) | 1 | - |
|
Laing L.
Defender
|
6.9 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 42/44(95%) | - | - |
|
Bayiha C.
Defender
|
6.6 | 62 | - | - | - | - | - | 13/22(59%) | - | - |
|
Elva C.
Forward
|
6.5 | 21 | - | - | - | 0.02 | - | 8/9(89%) | - | - |
|
Auguste C.
Midfielder
|
6.2 | 90 | - | 0.02 | - | 0.01 | 1 | 33/43(77%) | - | - |
|
Pearlman A.
Defender
|
6.1 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.02 | - | 34/42(81%) | - | - |
|
Biello A.
Midfielder
|
5.9 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.02 | - | 40/45(89%) | - | 1 |
|
Ferdinand K.
Defender
|
5.4 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 30/36(83%) | 1 | - |
|
Baldisimo M.
Midfielder
|
- | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - |
|
Ofori C.
Defender
|
- | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - |
xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Shots
| Player | Total shots | Shots on target | xGOT | Shots off target | Blocked shots | Shots header | Shots inside the Box | Shots outside the Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Rea S.
Midfielder
|
4 | 1 | 0.43 | - | 3 | - | 2 | 2 |
|
Auguste C.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Baldisimo M.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Bayiha C.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Biello A.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Elva C.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Ferdinand K.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Laing L.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Ofori C.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Pearlman A.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Attack
| Player | Touches in the opposition Box | Passes | Big chances created | Big chances missed | Assists | xA | Passes in final third | Touches | Passes long | Crosses | Successful dribbles | Fouled | Offsides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Bayiha C.
Defender
|
3 | 13/22(59%) | - | - | - | - | 3/8(38%) | 32 | - | - | 1/2(50%) | 1 | - |
|
Rea S.
Midfielder
|
3 | 34/44(77%) | - | 1 | - | 0.11 | 19/24(79%) | 65 | 3/5(60%) | - | 7/7(100%) | - | - |
|
Elva C.
Forward
|
1 | 8/9(89%) | - | - | - | 0.02 | 6/6(100%) | 15 | 1/2(50%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Pearlman A.
Defender
|
1 | 34/42(81%) | - | - | - | 0.02 | 15/20(75%) | 70 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Auguste C.
Midfielder
|
- | 33/43(77%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 3/6(50%) | 59 | 5/8(63%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Baldisimo M.
Midfielder
|
- | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Biello A.
Midfielder
|
- | 40/45(89%) | - | - | - | 0.02 | 9/11(82%) | 64 | 3/6(50%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Ferdinand K.
Defender
|
- | 30/36(83%) | - | - | - | - | 2/3(67%) | 45 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Laing L.
Defender
|
- | 42/44(95%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 3/3(100%) | 50 | 3/4(75%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Ofori C.
Defender
|
- | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Defending
| Player | Duels | Aerial duels | Ground duels | Foules | Tackles | Interceptions | Clearances | Error leading to goal | Error leading to shot | Own goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pearlman A.
Defender
|
12 | - | 4/12(33%) | 1 | 2/3(67%) | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Biello A.
Midfielder
|
11 | 2/3(67%) | 3/8(38%) | 2 | 2/2(100%) | 4 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Rea S.
Midfielder
|
10 | - | 7/10(70%) | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Auguste C.
Midfielder
|
5 | - | 3/4(75%) | - | 3/3(100%) | 1 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Bayiha C.
Defender
|
5 | - | 4/5(80%) | - | 2/2(100%) | 1 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Elva C.
Forward
|
4 | - | 3/4(75%) | - | 2/2(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Ferdinand K.
Defender
|
3 | - | 1/2(50%) | 2 | 1/1(100%) | - | 5 | - | - | - |
|
Ofori C.
Defender
|
2 | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Baldisimo M.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Laing L.
Defender
|
1 | - | - | - | - | 3 | 2 | - | - | - |
Goalkeeping
| Player | Goals prevented | Goalkeeper saves | xGOT faced | Goals Conceded | Punches | Throws | Sweeper keeper actions |
|---|
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
