• Football
• Leagues
• Czech Republic
• 1. Liga
• Pardubice x Teplice

Pardubice - Teplice 28.02.2026

• 28/02/26 09:00 |
  Round 24
• Pardubice

  Patrak V. - 40'
  • 1 : 1
  • Finished
  Teplice

  Bilek M. - 11'

Summary Lineups Player Statistics

PAR

Match details

TEP

1st Half 1:1

11 Bilek M.

33 Patrak V.

39 Krejci I L.

40 Patrak V. Assist: Krobot L.

2nd Half 0:0

46 Svanda J. Out: Marecek D.

46 Naprstek M. Out: Krejci I L.

62 Botos G. Out: Patrak V.

62 Smekal D. Out: Krobot L.

65 Fortelny J. Out: Bilek M.

69 Jelinek T. Out: Misek S.

73 Fully E. Out: Vecerka D.

80 Fortelny J.

85 Jukl R. Out: Kodes P.

85 Vecheta F. Out: Tanko A.

90 Mahuta R.

90 Zlatohlavek T.

90 + 2 Godwin E.

90 + 1 Radosta M.

PAR

Statistics

TEP

2.09

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

2.03

65 %

Ball possession

35 %

5

Big chances Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.

1

• 1.2 1.6 1.4
• Goals scored per match
• 1 1.2 1.2

• 1.5 1.4 1.3
• Goals conceded per match
• 1.2 0.8 0.8

• 34.4' 31' 33.3'
• Minutes/Goal scored
• 40.9' 45' 45'

Full Stats

PAR

H2H Stats

TEP

All tournaments 1. Liga Czech Cup Winter League Club Friendly Games 5 matches 10 matches 15 matches All matches 5 matches 10 matches All matches 5 matches 5 matches 5 matches

• 0wins
• 40% 2draws
• 60% 3wins

More H2H

Chat

Be the first to leave a comment

Go to chat

Top Scorers

Pardubice

Czech Republic 1. Liga

#

Goals

• 8 Patrak V.
  11
• 28 Tanko A.
  7
• 9 Smekal D.
  4
• 10 Vecheta F.
  3
• 19 Hlavaty M.
  1

Teplice

Czech Republic 1. Liga

#

Goals

• 6 Bilek M.
  9
• 10 Pulkrab M.
  5
• 46 Auta J.
  5
• 11 Kozak M.
  4
• 37 Marecek D.
  4

Show full top scorers

Match facts

The most common result of matches between FK Pardubice and FK Teplice is 1-1. 3 matches have ended with this result.

During the last 6 meetings with FK Pardubice playing at home, FK Pardubice have won 3 times, there have been 1 draws while FK Teplice have won 2 times. The goal difference is 9-6 in favour of FK Pardubice.

During the last 18 meetings, FK Pardubice have won 8 times, there have been 4 draws while FK Teplice have won 6 times. The goal difference is 21-20 in favour of FK Teplice.

Last season FK Teplice won both games against FK Pardubice (2-0 at home and 1-0 away).

Did you know that FK Pardubice scores 25% of their goals between the minutes 46-60?

Did you know that FK Teplice scores 26% of their goals between the minutes 76-90?

FK Pardubice have received 6 red cards this season. This is the highest number in 1. Liga.

FK Pardubice haven't scored in 3 of their 12 home matches in 1. Liga this season.

FK Teplice haven't scored in 5 of their 11 away matches in 1. Liga this season.

FK Teplice's away record this season: 2-5-4.

Vojtech Patrak is FK Pardubice's top scorer with 8 goals. Michal Bilek has scored 7 times for FK Teplice.

Abdullahi Tanko has assisted the most goals for FK Pardubice with 6. Denis Halinsky is FK Teplice's biggest assister (2).

Vojtech Patrak has more yellow cards (6) than any other player at FK Pardubice. John Auta has collected 6 for FK Teplice.

A year ago, FK Pardubice were number 15 in the table with 15 points. Now they are number 11 with 25 points.

FK Pardubice wins 1st half in 12% of their matches, FK Teplice in 27% of their matches.

FK Pardubice wins 12% of halftimes, FK Teplice wins 27%.

Their last meeting was a draw. (0-0)

When FK Pardubice leads 1-0 at home, they win in 60% of their matches.

When FK Teplice leads 0-1 away, they win in 75% of their matches.

When FK Pardubice is down 0-1 home, they win 21% of their matches.

When FK Teplice is down 1-0 away, they win 8% of their matches.

In 1. Liga, FK Pardubice has better performance than FK Teplice.

FK Teplice's performance of the last 5 matches is better than FK Pardubice's.

FK Teplice have lost just 0 of their last 5 games against FK Pardubice (in all competitions).

In the last 5 meetings FK Pardubice won 0, FK Teplice won 4, 1 draws.

FK Teplice have lost just 1 of their last 5 1. Liga games against FK Pardubice.

FK Pardubice have won just 1 of their last 5 1. Liga games against FK Teplice.

FK Pardubice scores 0 goals in a match against FK Teplice and FK Teplice scores 1.8 goals against FK Pardubice (on average).

Average number of goals in meetings between FK Pardubice and FK Teplice is 1.8.

Average number of goals in the first half in meetings between FK Pardubice and FK Teplice is 0.6.

Both teams haven't won their last match in 1. Liga.

Both teams didn't score on their last match.

FK Pardubice scores 1.2 goals when playing at home and FK Teplice scores 1.17 goals when playing away (on average).

FK Pardubice has streak of 2 matches with 0 scored goals.

Both teams lost their last match.

More facts

Predictions

As part of the 1. Liga (Czech Republic) tournament, the match between teams Pardubice and Teplice is scheduled. The game will start on 28.02 at 09:00. All sports bettors can follow in-depth Pardubice Teplice betting tips using the subsequent analysis of teams' statistics and prediction for the match.

8 / 10 of last matches in all competitions Pardubice did not draw

8 / 10 of last matches in 1. Liga Pardubice did not draw

7 / 10 of the last matches between the teams ended in a win

8 / 10 of last matches in all competitions Teplice did not draw

8 / 10 of last matches in 1. Liga Teplice did not draw

3 / 10 of her last matches Pardubice in all competitions ended in defeat

More predictions

PAR

Standings

TEP

Czech Republic 1. Liga

#	Group 1. Liga	GP	W	D	L	G	GD	P
7	Sigma Olomouc	30	12	7	11	34:34	0	43
8	Pardubice	30	11	8	11	39:46	-7	41
9	Karvina	30	12	3	15	43:51	-8	39
12	Zlin	30	9	7	14	37:48	-11	34
13	Teplice	30	6	11	13	29:38	-9	29
14	Dukla Prague	30	4	11	15	20:42	-22	23

#	Group Championship Round	GP	W	D	L	G	GD	P
1	Slavia Prague	35	24	8	3	74:31	43	80
2	AC Sparta Prague	35	23	7	5	69:34	35	76

Full Standings

PAR

Starting

TEP

Kharatishvili L. Goalkeeper Godwin E. Defender Mahuta R. Defender Konecny M. Defender Brian Noslin J. Defender Misek S. 69' Jelinek T. Hlavaty M. Midfielder Solil T. Midfielder Patrak V. 62' Botos G. Krobot L. 62' Smekal D. Tanko A. 85' Vecheta F.

Trmal M. Goalkeeper Halinsky D. Defender Vecerka D. 73' Fully E. Bilek M. 65' Fortelny J. Zlatohlavek T. Midfielder Krejci I L. 46' Naprstek M. Kodes P. 85' Jukl R. Marecek L. Midfielder Riznic M. Midfielder Radosta M. Midfielder Marecek D. 46' Svanda J.

PAR

Substitutes

TEP

Mandous A. Goalkeeper Boledovic T. Defender Hamza J. Defender Kopasek S. Defender Slyubyk B. Defender Botos G. 62' Out: Patrak V. Jelinek T. 69' Out: Misek S. Tredl J. Midfielder Vacek K. Midfielder Smekal D. 62' Out: Krobot L. Vecheta F. 85' Out: Tanko A.

Ludha R. Goalkeeper Svanda J. 46' Out: Marecek D. Jakubko J. Defender Fully E. 73' Out: Vecerka D. Svatek P. Defender Fortelny J. 65' Out: Bilek M. Jukl R. 85' Out: Kodes P. Pulkrab M. Forward Kozak M. Forward Naprstek M. 46' Out: Krejci I L. Nyarko B. Forward

PAR

Head coach

TEP

Trousil J. Coaches

Frtala Z. Coaches

Player Statistics

Overall Pardubice Teplice

Overview

Shots

Attack

Defending

Goalkeeping

Overview

Player	Grade	Minutes played	Goals	xG	Assists	xA	Total shots	Passes	Yellow cards	Red cards
Trmal M. Goalkeeper	8.3	90	-	-	-	-	-	16/35(46%)	-	-
Halinsky D. Defender	8.1	90	-	-	-	0.02	-	16/26(62%)	-	-
Hlavaty M. Midfielder	7.6	90	-	0.02	-	0.09	1	48/61(79%)	-	-
Svanda J. Defender	7.4	45	-	0.05	-	0.08	1	4/8(50%)	1	-
Brian Noslin J. Defender	7.2	90	-	0.06	-	0.1	1	41/56(73%)	-	-
Kharatishvili L. Goalkeeper	7.2	90	-	-	-	-	-	23/33(70%)	-	-
Konecny M. Defender	7.1	90	-	0.06	-	0.03	2	43/56(77%)	-	-
Marecek L. Midfielder	6.8	90	-	-	-	0.01	-	15/27(56%)	-	-
Naprstek M. Forward	6.7	45	-	-	-	-	-	7/9(78%)	-	-
Bilek M. Midfielder	6.6	66	1	0.82	-	0.06	2	10/22(45%)	-	-
Botos G. Midfielder	6.5	28	-	0.34	-	-	1	5/8(63%)	-	-
Solil T. Midfielder	6.5	90	-	-	-	0.01	-	58/66(88%)	-	-
Tanko A. Forward	6.4	85	-	0.39	-	0.14	2	11/15(73%)	-	-
Mahuta R. Defender	6.4	90	-	0.09	-	0.18	1	19/27(70%)	1	-
Marecek D. Midfielder	6.4	45	-	0.09	-	0.26	1	2/4(50%)	-	-
Kodes P. Midfielder	6.2	85	-	0.15	-	0.02	3	10/16(63%)	-	-
Riznic M. Midfielder	6.2	90	-	-	-	0.06	-	10/23(43%)	-	-
Smekal D. Forward	6.2	28	-	0.49	-	0.01	2	1/6(17%)	-	-
Jelinek T. Midfielder	6.1	21	-	-	-	0.01	-	5/9(56%)	-	-
Zlatohlavek T. Midfielder	5.9	90	-	0.06	-	0.03	1	13/19(68%)	1	-
Misek S. Midfielder	5.8	69	-	-	-	0.06	-	14/20(70%)	-	-
Vecerka D. Defender	5.7	73	-	-	-	-	-	14/19(74%)	-	-
Radosta M. Midfielder	5.6	90	-	0.15	-	-	1	8/12(67%)	1	-
Fortelny J. Midfielder	4.2	13	-	-	-	-	-	2/3(67%)	1	1
Jukl R. Midfielder	-	5	-	-	-	-	-	2/2(100%)	-	-
Vecheta F. Forward	-	5	-	-	-	-	-	1/4(25%)	-	-

xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Shots

Player	Total shots	Shots on target	xGOT	Shots off target	Blocked shots	Shots header	Shots inside the Box	Shots outside the Box
Kodes P. Midfielder	3	-	-	2	1	-	1	2
Bilek M. Midfielder	2	2	0.93	-	-	-	1	1
Konecny M. Defender	2	2	0.13	-	-	-	-	2
Smekal D. Forward	2	-	-	2	-	1	2	-
Tanko A. Forward	2	1	0.89	1	-	-	2	-
Botos G. Midfielder	1	1	0.19	-	-	-	1	-
Brian Noslin J. Defender	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	1
Hlavaty M. Midfielder	1	-	-	1	1	-	1	-
Mahuta R. Defender	1	-	-	1	-	-	1	-
Marecek D. Midfielder	1	1	0.09	-	-	-	1	-
Radosta M. Midfielder	1	1	0.15	-	-	-	1	-
Svanda J. Defender	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	1
Zlatohlavek T. Midfielder	1	-	-	-	1	-	1	-
Fortelny J. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Halinsky D. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Jelinek T. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Jukl R. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Kharatishvili L. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Marecek L. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Misek S. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Naprstek M. Forward	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Riznic M. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Solil T. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Trmal M. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Vecerka D. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Vecheta F. Forward	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.

Attack

Player	Touches in the opposition Box	Passes	Big chances created	Big chances missed	Assists	xA	Passes in final third	Touches	Passes long	Crosses	Successful dribbles	Fouled	Offsides
Tanko A. Forward	6	11/15(73%)	-	2	-	0.14	4/7(57%)	32	1/1(100%)	-	2/2(100%)	1	1
Radosta M. Midfielder	4	8/12(67%)	-	1	-	-	2/4(50%)	28	1/2(50%)	-	-	-	2
Smekal D. Forward	4	1/6(17%)	1	1	-	0.01	1/4(25%)	12	-	-	-	-	-
Hlavaty M. Midfielder	3	48/61(79%)	1	-	-	0.09	25/33(76%)	74	11/15(73%)	-	-	2	-
Marecek D. Midfielder	3	2/4(50%)	-	-	-	0.26	2/4(50%)	10	-	1/1(100%)	-	-	-
Zlatohlavek T. Midfielder	3	13/19(68%)	-	-	-	0.03	8/11(73%)	41	1/1(100%)	-	-	1	2
Botos G. Midfielder	2	5/8(63%)	-	1	-	-	3/5(60%)	15	-	-	-	1	-
Mahuta R. Defender	2	19/27(70%)	1	-	-	0.18	6/12(50%)	53	1/2(50%)	2/7(29%)	-	-	-
Solil T. Midfielder	2	58/66(88%)	-	-	-	0.01	4/7(57%)	82	4/10(40%)	-	-	2	1
Svanda J. Defender	2	4/8(50%)	1	-	-	0.08	2/4(50%)	20	-	-	-	1	-
Bilek M. Midfielder	1	10/22(45%)	-	-	-	0.06	2/11(18%)	33	2/5(40%)	1/1(100%)	-	1	-
Brian Noslin J. Defender	1	41/56(73%)	-	-	-	0.1	13/21(62%)	87	8/17(47%)	-	1/1(100%)	4	-
Kodes P. Midfielder	1	10/16(63%)	-	-	-	0.02	2/5(40%)	29	1/2(50%)	-	-	1	-
Misek S. Midfielder	1	14/20(70%)	-	-	-	0.06	7/7(100%)	27	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-
Fortelny J. Midfielder	-	2/3(67%)	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-	-	-	-
Halinsky D. Defender	-	16/26(62%)	-	-	-	0.02	4/7(57%)	56	4/8(50%)	-	-	3	-
Jelinek T. Midfielder	-	5/9(56%)	-	-	-	0.01	2/4(50%)	15	-	-	-	2	-
Jukl R. Midfielder	-	2/2(100%)	-	-	-	-	1/1(100%)	5	-	-	-	1	-
Kharatishvili L. Goalkeeper	-	23/33(70%)	-	-	-	-	-	41	6/16(38%)	-	-	1	-
Konecny M. Defender	-	43/56(77%)	-	-	-	0.03	10/15(67%)	81	4/8(50%)	-	-	-	-
Marecek L. Midfielder	-	15/27(56%)	-	-	-	0.01	5/6(83%)	45	1/6(17%)	-	-	-	-
Naprstek M. Forward	-	7/9(78%)	-	-	-	-	2/2(100%)	19	1/2(50%)	-	1/1(100%)	1	-
Riznic M. Midfielder	-	10/23(43%)	-	-	-	0.06	5/11(45%)	55	1/6(17%)	1/3(33%)	1/1(100%)	-	-
Trmal M. Goalkeeper	-	16/35(46%)	-	-	-	-	4/9(44%)	47	12/30(40%)	-	-	-	-
Vecerka D. Defender	-	14/19(74%)	-	-	-	-	-	28	-	-	-	-	-
Vecheta F. Forward	-	1/4(25%)	-	-	-	-	1/3(33%)	6	-	-	-	-	-

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Defending

Player	Duels	Aerial duels	Ground duels	Foules	Tackles	Interceptions	Clearances	Error leading to goal	Error leading to shot	Own goals
Zlatohlavek T. Midfielder	17	3/5(60%)	1/12(8%)	6	-	-	4	-	-	-
Halinsky D. Defender	12	4/5(80%)	5/7(71%)	1	1/2(50%)	4	14	-	-	-
Kodes P. Midfielder	11	1/2(50%)	5/9(56%)	2	1/4(25%)	-	-	-	-	-
Naprstek M. Forward	10	2/4(50%)	4/6(67%)	1	1/2(50%)	-	1	-	-	-
Solil T. Midfielder	10	4/6(67%)	4/4(100%)	1	1/2(50%)	4	5	-	-	-
Konecny M. Defender	9	3/5(60%)	3/4(75%)	1	2/3(67%)	2	3	-	-	-
Marecek L. Midfielder	9	3/5(60%)	1/4(25%)	2	1/1(100%)	3	6	-	-	-
Tanko A. Forward	9	-	5/7(71%)	1	1/2(50%)	-	-	-	-	-
Hlavaty M. Midfielder	7	-	2/5(40%)	2	-	2	-	-	-	-
Brian Noslin J. Defender	6	-	5/6(83%)	-	-	1	6	-	-	-
Radosta M. Midfielder	6	-	1/6(17%)	1	-	1	3	-	-	-
Mahuta R. Defender	5	-	1/5(20%)	1	-	1	-	-	-	-
Riznic M. Midfielder	5	-	1/4(25%)	1	-	4	5	-	-	-
Botos G. Midfielder	4	-	1/4(25%)	1	-	-	-	-	-	-
Smekal D. Forward	4	-	1/4(25%)	1	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-
Vecheta F. Forward	4	2/3(67%)	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Vecerka D. Defender	3	2/2(100%)	-	1	-	1	5	-	-	-
Jelinek T. Midfielder	2	-	2/2(100%)	-	-	1	-	-	-	-
Jukl R. Midfielder	2	-	2/2(100%)	-	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-
Marecek D. Midfielder	2	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Svanda J. Defender	2	-	1/2(50%)	1	-	-	3	-	-	-
Bilek M. Midfielder	1	1/2(50%)	1/1(100%)	-	-	3	2	-	-	-
Fortelny J. Midfielder	1	-	-	1	-	-	1	-	-	-
Kharatishvili L. Goalkeeper	1	-	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Misek S. Midfielder	1	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Trmal M. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-	-

Goalkeeping

Player	Goals prevented	Goalkeeper saves	xGOT faced	Goals Conceded	Punches	Throws	Sweeper keeper actions
Trmal M. Goalkeeper	1	4	2	1	1	4	2
Kharatishvili L. Goalkeeper	0.17	4	1.17	1	-	3	-

Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.

xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.