• Football
• Leagues
• Czech Republic
• 1. Liga
• Teplice x Dukla Prague

Teplice - Dukla Prague 16.05.2026

• 16/05/26 11:00 |
  Round 4
• Teplice

  Fortelny J. - 74'

  Hopi I. - 90+5'
  • 2 : 0
  • Finished
  Dukla Prague

Summary Lineups Player Statistics

TEP

Match details

DUK

1st Half 0:0

2 Trmal M.

32 Svanda J.

45 Riznic M. Out: Svanda J.

2nd Half 2:0

46 Naprstek M. Out: Kodes P.

60 Kreiker D. Out: Mikus R.

60 Fortelny J. Out: Marecek D.

61 Hopi I. Out: Kozak M.

65 Milla K.

70 Kozma D.

74 Fortelny J.

83 Hasek D. Out: Tijani S.

86 Naprstek M.

87 Audinis N. Out: Zlatohlavek T.

89 Hunal E.

90 + 5 Hopi I. Assist: Radosta M.

90 Penxa L. Out: Gilbert D.

TEP

Statistics

DUK

1.03

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

0.89

55 %

Ball possession

45 %

1

Big chances Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.

1

10 Matches

4 - Wins

2 - Draws

4 - Losses

10 Matches

2 - Wins

5 - Draws

3 - Losses

10 Matches

2 - Wins

4 - Draws

4 - Losses

10 Matches

Wins - 1

Draws - 4

Losses - 5

10 Matches

Wins - 3

Draws - 3

Losses - 4

10 Matches

Wins - 4

Draws - 2

Losses - 4

• 50% 5/10
• Both team to score
• 5/10 50%

• 47%
• Ball possession
• 44%

• 13 1.3
• Goals scored per match
• 10 1

• 6.41 0.64
• xG (Expected Goals) per match
• 9.29 0.93

• 15 1.5
• Goals conceded per match
• 10 1

• 9.06 0.91
• Expected goals conceded (xCG) per match
• 12.28 1.23

Full Stats

TEP

H2H Stats

DUK

All tournaments 1. Liga Czech Cup Club Friendly Games 5 matches 10 matches 15 matches All matches 5 matches 10 matches 15 matches All matches 5 matches 5 matches

• 40% 2wins
• 60% 3draws
• 0wins

More H2H

Chat

Be the first to leave a comment

Go to chat

Top Scorers

Teplice

Czech Republic 1. Liga

#

Goals

• 6 Bilek M.
  9
• 10 Pulkrab M.
  5
• 46 Auta J.
  5
• 11 Kozak M.
  4
• 37 Marecek D.
  4

Dukla Prague

Czech Republic 1. Liga

#

Goals

• 19 Cermak M.
  5
• 3 Sehovic Z.
  2
• 9 Kroupa M.
  2
• 15 Gilbert D.
  2
• 47 Kreiker D.
  2

Show full top scorers

Match facts

The most common result of matches between FK Teplice and Dukla Prague when FK Teplice is playing at home is 1-1. 3 matches have ended with this result.

The most common result of matches between FK Teplice and Dukla Prague is 1-1. 4 matches have ended with this result.

During the last 12 meetings with FK Teplice playing at home, FK Teplice have won 5 times, there have been 5 draws while Dukla Prague have won 2 times. The goal difference is 21-12 in favour of FK Teplice.

During the last 27 meetings, FK Teplice have won 11 times, there have been 7 draws while Dukla Prague have won 9 times. The goal difference is 45-44 in favour of FK Teplice.

Dukla Prague's last away win against FK Teplice was in 2021.

FK Teplice's last home win against Dukla Prague was in 2018.

When playing at home, FK Teplice have not lost to Dukla Prague in their last 3 encounters.

Dukla Prague's away record this season: 1-6-9.

Michal Bilek is FK Teplice's top scorer with 9 goals. Marcel Cermak has scored 5 times for Dukla Prague.

FK Teplice have conceded a goal in each of their last 9 matches.

Dukla Prague have conceded a goal in each of their last 7 matches.

FK Teplice wins 1st half in 25% of their matches, Dukla Prague in 27% of their matches.

FK Teplice wins 25% of halftimes, Dukla Prague wins 27%.

Their last meeting was a draw. (0-0)

When FK Teplice leads 1-0 at home, they win in 58% of their matches.

When Dukla Prague leads 0-1 away, they win in 50% of their matches.

When FK Teplice is down 0-1 home, they win 0% of their matches.

When Dukla Prague is down 1-0 away, they win 9% of their matches.

FK Teplice have lost just 0 of their last 5 games against Dukla Prague (in all competitions).

In the last 5 meetings FK Teplice won 1, Dukla Prague won 0, 4 draws.

FK Teplice scores 1.4 goals in a match against Dukla Prague and Dukla Prague scores 1 goals against FK Teplice (on average).

Average number of goals in meetings between FK Teplice and Dukla Prague is 2.4.

Average number of goals in the first half in meetings between FK Teplice and Dukla Prague is 1.4.

FK Teplice scores 1.2 goals when playing at home and Dukla Prague scores 0.92 goals when playing away (on average).

Matej Pulkrab has assisted the most goals for FK Teplice with 3. Marcel Cermak is Dukla Prague's biggest assister (4).

In 1. Liga, FK Teplice has better performance than Dukla Prague.

FK Teplice's performance of the last 5 matches is better than Dukla Prague's.

More facts

Predictions

As part of the 1. Liga (Czech Republic) tournament, the match between teams Teplice and Dukla Prague is scheduled. The game will start on 16.05 at 11:00. All sports bettors can follow in-depth Teplice Dukla Prague betting tips using the subsequent analysis of teams' statistics and prediction for the match.

4 / 10 of last matches Teplice in all competitions ended in a draw

5 / 10 of last matches Teplice in 1. Liga ended in a draw

4 / 10 of last matches between the teams ended in a draw

2 / 10 of last matches Dukla Prague in all competitions ended in a draw

2 / 10 of last matches Dukla Prague in 1. Liga ended in a draw

4 / 10 of last matches between the teams ended in a draw

More predictions

TEP

Standings

DUK

Czech Republic 1. Liga

#	Group 1. Liga	GP	W	D	L	G	GD	P
11	Mlada Boleslav	30	8	11	11	44:52	-8	35
12	Zlin	30	9	7	14	37:48	-11	34
13	Teplice	30	6	11	13	29:38	-9	29
14	Dukla Prague	30	4	11	15	20:42	-22	23
15	1. Slovacko	30	5	8	17	26:45	-19	23
16	Banik Ostrava	30	5	7	18	25:45	-20	22

#	Group Championship Round	GP	W	D	L	G	GD	P
1	Slavia Prague	35	24	8	3	74:31	43	80
2	AC Sparta Prague	35	23	7	5	69:34	35	76

Full Standings

TEP

Starting

DUK

Trmal M. Goalkeeper Svanda J. 45' Riznic M. Vecerka D. Defender Halinsky D. Defender Bilek M. Midfielder Marecek L. Midfielder Marecek D. 60' Fortelny J. Kodes P. 46' Naprstek M. Zlatohlavek T. 87' Audinis N. Radosta M. Midfielder Kozak M. 61' Hopi I.

Backovsky H. Goalkeeper Hunal E. Defender Traore M. Defender Kozma D. Defender Pourzitidis M. Defender Tijani S. 83' Hasek D. Gilbert D. 90' Penxa L. Velasquez D. Midfielder Mikus R. 60' Kreiker D. Cermak M. Midfielder Milla K. Forward

TEP

Substitutes

DUK

Lichtenberg K. Goalkeeper Ludha R. Goalkeeper Jakubko J. Defender Audinis N. 87' Out: Zlatohlavek T. Fully E. Defender Riznic M. 45' Out: Svanda J. Takacs L. Midfielder Fortelny J. 60' Out: Marecek D. Naprstek M. 46' Out: Kodes P. Hopi I. 61' Out: Kozak M. Pulkrab M. Forward

Jagrik A. Goalkeeper Kreiker D. 60' Out: Mikus R. Svozil J. Defender Hasek D. 83' Out: Tijani S. Sehovic Z. Defender Penxa L. 90' Out: Gilbert D. Zitny M. Midfielder Unusic B. Midfielder Gaszczyk P. Midfielder Hanousek M. Midfielder Pekhart T. Forward

TEP

Head coach

DUK

Frtala Z. Coaches

Sustr P. Coaches

Player Statistics

Overall Teplice Dukla Prague

Overview

Shots

Attack

Defending

Goalkeeping

Overview

Player	Grade	Minutes played	Goals	xG	Assists	xA	Total shots	Passes	Yellow cards	Red cards
Trmal M. Goalkeeper	8	90	-	-	-	-	-	34/41(83%)	1	-
Radosta M. Midfielder	7.6	90	-	-	1	0.04	-	26/34(76%)	-	-
Fortelny J. Midfielder	7.6	30	1	0.03	-	-	2	6/7(86%)	-	-
Riznic M. Midfielder	7.3	45	-	-	-	-	-	14/18(78%)	-	-
Cermak M. Midfielder	7.1	90	-	0.12	-	0.14	2	24/29(83%)	-	-
Velasquez D. Midfielder	7	90	-	0.01	-	0.02	1	20/29(69%)	-	-
Bilek M. Midfielder	6.9	90	-	0.08	-	0.16	1	28/40(70%)	-	-
Marecek L. Midfielder	6.9	90	-	-	-	0.01	-	37/40(93%)	-	-
Naprstek M. Forward	6.9	45	-	0.05	-	0.13	2	15/17(88%)	1	-
Halinsky D. Defender	6.8	90	-	-	-	-	-	50/61(82%)	-	-
Kozma D. Defender	6.7	90	-	-	-	0.31	-	24/30(80%)	1	-
Svanda J. Defender	6.7	45	-	-	-	0.01	-	13/16(81%)	1	-
Vecerka D. Defender	6.4	90	-	-	-	-	-	52/55(95%)	-	-
Mikus R. Midfielder	6.4	60	-	0.07	-	0.12	1	4/11(36%)	-	-
Zlatohlavek T. Midfielder	6.4	87	-	-	-	0.08	-	15/22(68%)	-	-
Kodes P. Midfielder	6.2	45	-	-	-	0.02	-	16/20(80%)	-	-
Tijani S. Midfielder	6.2	83	-	-	-	0.01	-	20/24(83%)	-	-
Kozak M. Forward	6.1	61	-	-	-	-	-	5/12(42%)	-	-
Pourzitidis M. Defender	6.1	90	-	0.05	-	0.01	3	30/39(77%)	-	-
Kreiker D. Defender	6.1	30	-	0.02	-	0.01	1	3/4(75%)	-	-
Backovsky H. Goalkeeper	6	90	-	-	-	-	-	24/40(60%)	-	-
Marecek D. Midfielder	6	60	-	0.08	-	-	1	5/10(50%)	-	-
Traore M. Defender	5.8	83	-	-	-	-	-	31/39(79%)	-	-
Milla K. Forward	5.6	65	-	0.39	-	0.29	3	9/12(75%)	-	1
Hunal E. Defender	5.1	89	-	-	-	0.07	-	25/34(74%)	-	1
Audinis N. Defender	-	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hasek D. Defender	-	7	-	-	-	0.01	-	3/5(60%)	-	-
Pekhart T. Forward	-	7	-	-	-	-	-	1/2(50%)	-	-
Penxa L. Midfielder	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Shots

Player	Total shots	Shots on target	xGOT	Shots off target	Blocked shots	Shots header	Shots inside the Box	Shots outside the Box
Milla K. Forward	3	1	0.09	2	-	1	3	-
Pourzitidis M. Defender	3	-	-	2	1	-	-	3
Cermak M. Midfielder	2	1	0.07	1	-	-	1	1
Fortelny J. Midfielder	2	1	0.26	1	-	-	-	2
Naprstek M. Forward	2	1	0.08	1	-	-	-	2
Bilek M. Midfielder	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	1
Kreiker D. Defender	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	1
Marecek D. Midfielder	1	1	0.2	-	-	-	1	-
Mikus R. Midfielder	1	-	-	1	-	-	-	1
Velasquez D. Midfielder	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	1
Audinis N. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Backovsky H. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Halinsky D. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hasek D. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hunal E. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Kodes P. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Kozak M. Forward	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Kozma D. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Marecek L. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Pekhart T. Forward	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Penxa L. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Radosta M. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Riznic M. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Svanda J. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Tijani S. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Traore M. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Trmal M. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Vecerka D. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Zlatohlavek T. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.

Attack

Player	Touches in the opposition Box	Passes	Big chances created	Big chances missed	Assists	xA	Passes in final third	Touches	Passes long	Crosses	Successful dribbles	Fouled	Offsides
Milla K. Forward	5	9/12(75%)	1	-	-	0.29	6/8(75%)	22	-	-	1/1(100%)	1	-
Cermak M. Midfielder	3	24/29(83%)	-	-	-	0.14	10/13(77%)	46	2/3(67%)	-	-	2	-
Radosta M. Midfielder	3	26/34(76%)	1	-	1	0.04	6/11(55%)	55	3/6(50%)	-	-	1	-
Kozak M. Forward	2	5/12(42%)	-	-	-	-	1/3(33%)	20	-	-	-	1	1
Kozma D. Defender	2	24/30(80%)	-	-	-	0.31	9/12(75%)	51	-	-	1/1(100%)	1	-
Marecek D. Midfielder	2	5/10(50%)	-	-	-	-	-	17	1/2(50%)	-	1/1(100%)	1	-
Svanda J. Defender	2	13/16(81%)	-	-	-	0.01	5/7(71%)	31	1/2(50%)	-	2/4(50%)	2	1
Hasek D. Defender	1	3/5(60%)	-	-	-	0.01	2/4(50%)	7	2/2(100%)	-	-	-	-
Pourzitidis M. Defender	1	30/39(77%)	-	-	-	0.01	3/6(50%)	56	2/7(29%)	-	-	3	-
Velasquez D. Midfielder	1	20/29(69%)	-	-	-	0.02	7/11(64%)	45	1/2(100%)	-	-	4	-
Audinis N. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Backovsky H. Goalkeeper	-	24/40(60%)	-	-	-	-	3/13(23%)	51	9/25(36%)	-	-	1	-
Bilek M. Midfielder	-	28/40(70%)	-	-	-	0.16	9/17(53%)	56	1/4(25%)	2/5(40%)	-	-	-
Fortelny J. Midfielder	-	6/7(86%)	-	-	-	-	1/1(100%)	15	-	-	-	-	-
Halinsky D. Defender	-	50/61(82%)	-	-	-	-	3/7(43%)	67	4/13(31%)	-	-	3	-
Hunal E. Defender	-	25/34(74%)	-	-	-	0.07	3/7(43%)	45	3/9(33%)	-	-	3	-
Kodes P. Midfielder	-	16/20(80%)	-	-	-	0.02	3/6(50%)	21	2/3(67%)	-	-	-	-
Kreiker D. Defender	-	3/4(75%)	-	-	-	0.01	3/3(100%)	9	-	-	-	-	-
Marecek L. Midfielder	-	37/40(93%)	-	-	-	0.01	7/8(88%)	64	-	1/2(50%)	-	2	-
Mikus R. Midfielder	-	4/11(36%)	-	-	-	0.12	2/5(40%)	28	-	1/2(50%)	1/3(33%)	2	-
Naprstek M. Forward	-	15/17(88%)	-	-	-	0.13	6/6(100%)	27	1/1(100%)	-	1/1(100%)	1	-
Pekhart T. Forward	-	1/2(50%)	-	-	-	-	1/1(100%)	3	-	-	-	1	-
Penxa L. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-
Riznic M. Midfielder	-	14/18(78%)	-	-	-	-	3/4(75%)	27	2/5(40%)	-	1/1(100%)	-	-
Tijani S. Midfielder	-	20/24(83%)	-	-	-	0.01	3/5(60%)	34	4/7(57%)	-	1/1(100%)	2	-
Traore M. Defender	-	31/39(79%)	-	-	-	-	-	47	3/8(38%)	-	1/1(100%)	1	-
Trmal M. Goalkeeper	-	34/41(83%)	-	-	-	-	-	59	8/15(53%)	-	-	-	-
Vecerka D. Defender	-	52/55(95%)	-	-	-	-	-	60	1/3(33%)	-	-	1	-
Zlatohlavek T. Midfielder	-	15/22(68%)	-	-	-	0.08	4/6(67%)	31	-	-	-	5	1

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Defending

Player	Duels	Aerial duels	Ground duels	Foules	Tackles	Interceptions	Clearances	Error leading to goal	Error leading to shot	Own goals
Zlatohlavek T. Midfielder	16	3/7(43%)	4/9(44%)	5	-	1	-	-	-	-
Kozma D. Defender	14	3/6(50%)	4/8(50%)	3	1/2(50%)	3	1	-	-	-
Radosta M. Midfielder	12	1/3(33%)	3/9(33%)	2	2/2(100%)	-	2	-	-	-
Marecek L. Midfielder	10	2/5(40%)	3/5(60%)	1	1/1(100%)	1	7	-	1	-
Pourzitidis M. Defender	10	2/4(50%)	4/6(67%)	2	1/1(100%)	-	1	-	-	-
Cermak M. Midfielder	9	3/3(100%)	3/6(50%)	3	-	1	1	-	-	-
Mikus R. Midfielder	9	1/2(50%)	3/7(43%)	1	-	1	2	-	-	-
Svanda J. Defender	9	-	6/7(86%)	-	2/2(100%)	-	-	-	-	-
Tijani S. Midfielder	9	1/2(50%)	3/7(43%)	2	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-
Velasquez D. Midfielder	9	-	6/8(75%)	-	1/2(50%)	5	-	-	-	-
Halinsky D. Defender	7	-	3/5(60%)	2	-	2	1	-	-	-
Hunal E. Defender	7	1/2(50%)	3/5(60%)	1	1/1(100%)	1	6	-	-	-
Milla K. Forward	7	-	2/7(29%)	5	-	-	-	-	-	-
Bilek M. Midfielder	6	2/3(67%)	-	2	-	-	5	-	-	-
Kozak M. Forward	6	-	1/6(17%)	2	-	-	-	-	-	-
Riznic M. Midfielder	6	2/4(50%)	2/2(100%)	-	1/1(100%)	-	5	-	-	-
Traore M. Defender	6	1/2(50%)	3/4(75%)	2	-	-	4	-	-	-
Fortelny J. Midfielder	5	-	2/4(50%)	2	-	-	1	-	-	-
Naprstek M. Forward	4	-	2/4(50%)	1	-	-	1	-	-	-
Vecerka D. Defender	4	1/1(100%)	1/3(33%)	2	-	1	2	-	-	-
Backovsky H. Goalkeeper	3	-	2/3(67%)	-	1/1(100%)	-	1	-	-	-
Hasek D. Defender	3	1/1(100%)	1/2(50%)	-	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-
Kodes P. Midfielder	3	-	1/3(25%)	1	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-
Marecek D. Midfielder	3	-	2/3(67%)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Kreiker D. Defender	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Pekhart T. Forward	1	1/1(100%)	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Penxa L. Midfielder	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Trmal M. Goalkeeper	1	-	-	1	-	-	1	-	-	-
Audinis N. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Goalkeeping

Player	Goals prevented	Goalkeeper saves	xGOT faced	Goals Conceded	Punches	Throws	Sweeper keeper actions
Trmal M. Goalkeeper	0.56	3	0.56	-	-	11	-
Backovsky H. Goalkeeper	-0.49	2	1.51	2	1	3	-

Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.

xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.