• Football
• Leagues
• Latvia
• Virsliga
• Grobina x Riga FC

Grobina - Riga FC 18.04.2026

• 18/04/26 07:00 |
  Round 7
• Grobina
  • 0 : 3
  • Finished
  Riga FC

  Varslavans R. - 18'

  Siqueira I. - 36', 40'

Summary Player Statistics

GRB

Match details

RFC

1st Half 0:3

18 Varslavans R.

36 Siqueira I.

40 Siqueira I.

2nd Half 0:0

GRB

Statistics

RFC

0.18

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

1.92

22 %

Ball possession

78 %

0

Big chances Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.

2

• 0.9 0.8 0.8
• Goals scored per match
• 3.5 2.2 3.1

• 1.2 1.3 0.8
• Goals conceded per match
• 1.2 0.9 1.7

• 42.9' 42.9' 56.3'
• Minutes/Goal scored
• 19.1' 29' 18.8'

Full Stats

GRB

H2H Stats

RFC

All tournaments Virsliga 5 matches 10 matches All matches 5 matches 10 matches All matches

• 0wins
• 20% 1draws
• 80% 4wins

More H2H

Chat

Be the first to leave a comment

Go to chat

Top Scorers

Grobina

Latvia Virsliga

No data available

Riga FC

Latvia Virsliga

No data available

Match facts

The most common result of matches between Grobinas SC/LFS and Riga FC is 0-2. 3 matches have ended with this result.

During the last 8 meetings, Grobinas SC/LFS have won 0 times, there have been 1 draws while Riga FC have won 7 times. The goal difference is 23-2 in favour of Riga FC.

Did you know that Riga FC scores 33% of their goals between the minutes 76-90?

Grobinas SC/LFS have played 6 home matches in a row without winning.

Riga FC haven't lost in their last 5 games.

When playing at home, Grobinas SC/LFS have not scored a goal so far this season.

Riga FC haven't scored in 0 of their 4 away matches in Virsliga this season.

A year ago, Grobinas SC/LFS were number 10 in the table with 4 points. Now they are number 5 with 7 points.

Riga FC have scored at least one goal for 12 consecutive matches.

Grobinas SC/LFS wins 1st half in 26% of their matches, Riga FC in 55% of their matches.

Grobinas SC/LFS wins 26% of halftimes, Riga FC wins 55%.

Their last meeting was a draw. (1-1)

When Grobinas SC/LFS leads 1-0 at home, they win in 83% of their matches.

When Riga FC leads 0-1 away, they win in 88% of their matches.

When Grobinas SC/LFS is down 0-1 home, they win 0% of their matches.

When Riga FC is down 1-0 away, they win 33% of their matches.

In Virsliga, Riga FC has better performance than Grobinas SC/LFS.

Riga FC's performance of the last 5 matches is better than Grobinas SC/LFS's.

Riga FC have lost just 0 of their last 5 games against Grobinas SC/LFS (in all competitions).

In the last 5 meetings Grobinas SC/LFS won 0, Riga FC won 4, 1 draws.

Riga FC have lost just 0 of their last 5 Virsliga games against Grobinas SC/LFS.

Grobinas SC/LFS have won just 0 of their last 5 Virsliga games against Riga FC.

Grobinas SC/LFS scores 0.4 goals in a match against Riga FC and Riga FC scores 2.8 goals against Grobinas SC/LFS (on average).

Average number of goals in meetings between Grobinas SC/LFS and Riga FC is 3.2.

Average number of goals in the first half in meetings between Grobinas SC/LFS and Riga FC is 1.2.

Both teams haven't won their last match in Virsliga.

Grobinas SC/LFS scores 0.94 goals when playing at home and Riga FC scores 2.42 goals when playing away (on average).

Riga FC have a winning streak of 3 matches away from home.

More facts

Predictions

As part of the Virsliga (Latvia) tournament, the match between teams Grobina and Riga FC is scheduled. The game will start on 18.04 at 07:00. All sports bettors can follow in-depth Grobina Riga FC betting tips using the subsequent analysis of teams' statistics and prediction for the match.

3 / 10 of the last matches Grobina in Virsliga ended with its defeat in the 1st half

5 / 10 of the last matches Riga FC in all tournaments ended with its victory in the 1st half

5 / 10 of the last matches Riga FC in Virsliga ended with its victory in the 1st half

4 / 8 of the last matches between the teams ended with a victory Riga FC in the 1st half

2 / 10 of her last matches Grobina in all competitions ended in defeat

2 / 10 of last matches Grobina in Virsliga ended in defeat

More predictions

GRB

Standings

RFC

Latvia Virsliga

#	Team	GP	W	D	L	G	GD	P
1	Riga FC	19	15	3	1	60:19	41	48
2	Rigas Futbola Skola	18	15	1	2	42:14	28	46
8	Tukums 2000	19	3	8	8	33:36	-3	17
9	Grobina	19	3	7	9	12:30	-18	16
10	Ogre United	18	1	4	13	16:42	-26	7

Full Standings

Player Statistics

Overall Grobina Riga FC

Overview

Shots

Attack

Defending

Goalkeeping

Overview

Player	Grade	Minutes played	Goals	xG	Assists	xA	Total shots	Passes	Yellow cards	Red cards
Jurkovskis R. Defender	8.5	90	-	0.05	1	0.19	2	58/66(88%)	-	-
Varslavans R. Midfielder	8.1	90	1	0.11	-	0.2	1	51/57(89%)	-	-
Cernomordijs A. Defender	8	81	-	0.1	-	0.1	2	82/98(84%)	-	-
Galo O. Midfielder	7.4	68	-	0.26	1	0.22	3	32/39(82%)	-	-
Zviedris K. Goalkeeper	7.1	90	-	-	-	-	-	24/26(92%)	-	-
Birka E. Defender	6.9	60	-	-	-	0.18	-	26/30(87%)	-	-
Salazar Osorio A. Defender	6.3	30	-	0.11	-	0.01	1	20/27(74%)	-	-
Fjodorovs M. Defender	5.8	58	-	0.02	-	0.38	1	8/11(73%)	-	-

xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Shots

Player	Total shots	Shots on target	xGOT	Shots off target	Blocked shots	Shots header	Shots inside the Box	Shots outside the Box
Galo O. Midfielder	3	-	-	-	3	-	2	1
Cernomordijs A. Defender	2	1	0.68	-	1	2	2	-
Jurkovskis R. Defender	2	1	0.05	-	1	-	-	2
Fjodorovs M. Defender	1	-	-	1	-	1	1	-
Salazar Osorio A. Defender	1	-	-	-	1	-	1	-
Varslavans R. Midfielder	1	1	0.58	-	-	-	1	-
Birka E. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Zviedris K. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.

Attack

Player	Touches in the opposition Box	Passes	Big chances created	Big chances missed	Assists	xA	Passes in final third	Touches	Passes long	Crosses	Successful dribbles	Fouled	Offsides
Galo O. Midfielder	5	32/39(82%)	1	-	1	0.22	6/11(55%)	52	1/3(33%)	-	-	3	-
Cernomordijs A. Defender	4	82/98(84%)	-	-	-	0.1	13/22(59%)	107	5/13(38%)	-	-	1	-
Birka E. Defender	3	26/30(87%)	-	-	-	0.18	9/11(82%)	50	1/2(50%)	2/2(100%)	-	1	-
Varslavans R. Midfielder	2	51/57(89%)	-	-	-	0.2	23/26(88%)	75	-	1/5(20%)	-	5	-
Fjodorovs M. Defender	1	8/11(73%)	-	-	-	0.38	2/4(50%)	14	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-
Jurkovskis R. Defender	1	58/66(88%)	-	-	1	0.19	25/30(83%)	103	1/3(33%)	1/6(17%)	-	-	-
Salazar Osorio A. Defender	1	20/27(74%)	-	-	-	0.01	4/7(57%)	32	1/4(25%)	-	-	-	-
Zviedris K. Goalkeeper	-	24/26(92%)	-	-	-	-	-	32	-	-	-	1	-

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Defending

Player	Duels	Aerial duels	Ground duels	Foules	Tackles	Interceptions	Clearances	Error leading to goal	Error leading to shot	Own goals
Galo O. Midfielder	12	1/4(25%)	4/8(50%)	4	-	1	1	-	-	-
Jurkovskis R. Defender	10	2/3(67%)	2/7(29%)	1	1/2(50%)	-	2	-	-	-
Varslavans R. Midfielder	9	-	5/8(63%)	1	-	-	-	-	-	-
Cernomordijs A. Defender	6	4/4(100%)	1/2(50%)	-	1/1(100%)	1	1	-	-	-
Birka E. Defender	3	-	1/3(33%)	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Fjodorovs M. Defender	3	-	-	3	-	-	2	-	-	-
Salazar Osorio A. Defender	2	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Zviedris K. Goalkeeper	2	1/1(100%)	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Goalkeeping

Player	Goals prevented	Goalkeeper saves	xGOT faced	Goals Conceded	Punches	Throws	Sweeper keeper actions
Zviedris K. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	4	-

Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.

xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.