• Football
• Leagues
• USA
• National Womens Soccer League
• Houston Dash (Women) x San Diego Wave FC (Women)

Houston Dash (Women) - San Diego Wave FC (Women) 20.05.2026

• 20/05/26 20:00
• Houston Dash (Women)

  Faasse K. - 70'

  Rader K. - 89'
  • 2 : 2
  • Finished
  San Diego Wave FC (Women)

  Dudinha - 20'

  Byars T. - 90+5'

Summary Lineups Player Statistics

HDA

Match details

SAN

1st Half 0:1

20 Dudinha

23 Patterson A.

24 Van Zanten A.

33 Morroni P.

45 Faasse K. Out: Colaprico D.

2nd Half 2:1

56 Puntigam S. Out: Nielsen P.

59 Byars T. Out: Ludmila

59 Pickett K. Out: Van Zanten A.

59 Corley G. Out: Barcenas M.

68 Chapman A. Out: Boattin L.

68 Schmidt S. Out: Ullmark L.

70 Faasse K.

71 Portilho G. Out: Godfrey L.

83 DeLisle C. Out: Campbell J.

83 Byars T.

84 Fazer L. Out: Ascanio K.

89 Rader K.

90 + 1 Wynalda T. Out: Dudinha

90 + 5 Byars T.

90 + 6 Ekic E. Out: Rader K.

90 + 8 Fazer L.

HDA

Statistics

SAN

0.2

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

3.09

41 %

Ball possession

59 %

0

Big chances Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.

4

10 Matches

5 - Wins

3 - Draws

2 - Losses

10 Matches

2 - Wins

1 - Draws

7 - Losses

10 Matches

3 - Wins

1 - Draws

6 - Losses

10 Matches

Wins - 4

Draws - 0

Losses - 6

10 Matches

Wins - 5

Draws - 1

Losses - 4

10 Matches

Wins - 7

Draws - 0

Losses - 3

• 20% 2/10
• Both team to score
• 3/10 30%

• 45%
• Ball possession
• 58%

• 10 1
• Goals scored per match
• 15 1.5

• 8.58 0.86
• xG (Expected Goals) per match
• 6.71 0.67

• 17 1.7
• Goals conceded per match
• 10 1

• 11.92 1.19
• Expected goals conceded (xCG) per match
• 3.81 0.38

Full Stats

HDA

H2H Stats

SAN

All tournaments National Womens Soccer League 5 matches All matches 5 matches All matches

• 60% 3wins
• 20% 1draws
• 20% 1wins

More H2H

Chat

Be the first to leave a comment

Go to chat

Top Scorers

Houston Dash (Women)

USA National Womens Soccer League

#

Goals

• 12 Vanzanten K.
  4
• 22 Rader K.
  4
• 19 Graham M.
  3
• 25 Doniak M.
  1
• 17 Puntigam S.
  1

San Diego Wave FC (Women)

USA National Womens Soccer League

#

Goals

• 88 Dudinha
  5
• 22 Godfrey L.
  4
• 15 Byars T.
  3
• 7 Barcenas M.
  2
• 17 Ludmila
  1

Show full top scorers

Who will win?

• Houston Dash (Women)
• Draw
• San Diego Wave FC (Women)

Vote and compare your choice with other fans!

Will both teams score?

• Yes
• No

Vote and compare your choice with other fans!

Who will score first?

• Houston Dash (Women)
• No goal
• San Diego Wave FC (Women)

Vote and compare your choice with other fans!

Predictions

As part of the National Womens Soccer League (USA) tournament, the match between teams Houston Dash (Women) and San Diego Wave FC (Women) is scheduled. The game will start on 20.05 at 20:00. All sports bettors can follow in-depth Houston Dash (Women) San Diego Wave FC (Women) betting tips using the subsequent analysis of teams' statistics and prediction for the match.

9 / 10 of last matches in all competitions Houston Dash (Women) did not draw

9 / 10 of last matches in National Womens Soccer League Houston Dash (Women) did not draw

8 / 9 of the last matches between the teams ended in a win

10 / 10 of last matches in all competitions San Diego Wave FC (Women) did not draw

10 / 10 of last matches in National Womens Soccer League San Diego Wave FC (Women) did not draw

4 / 10 of last matches in all competitions Houston Dash (Women) did not lose

More predictions

HDA

Standings

SAN

USA National Womens Soccer League

#	Team	GP	W	D	L	G	GD	P
1	San Diego Wave FC (Women)	13	8	1	4	19:13	6	25
2	Utah Royals (Women)	12	7	3	2	18:10	8	24
10	Seattle Reign (Women)	11	4	2	5	10:13	-3	14
11	Houston Dash (Women)	12	4	2	6	14:19	-5	14
12	Angel City FC (Women)	11	4	1	6	16:14	2	13

Full Standings

HDA

Starting

SAN

Campbell J. 83' DeLisle C. Hardin C. Defender Berkely M. Defender Klenke L. Defender Nielsen P. 56' Puntigam S. Boattin L. 68' Chapman A. Patterson A. Midfielder Ullmark L. 68' Schmidt S. Graham M. Midfielder Colaprico D. 45' Faasse K. Rader K. 90' Ekic E.

Haracic D. Goalkeeper Wesley K. Defender Morroni P. Defender McNabb K. Defender Ascanio K. 84' Fazer L. Van Zanten A. 59' Pickett K. Dali K. Midfielder Godfrey L. 71' Portilho G. Dudinha 90' Wynalda T. Barcenas M. 59' Corley G. Ludmila 59' Byars T.

HDA

Substitutes

SAN

DeLisle C. 83' Out: Campbell J. Chapman A. 68' Out: Boattin L. Schmidt S. 68' Out: Ullmark L. Duljan E. Midfielder Puntigam S. 56' Out: Nielsen P. Faasse K. 45' Out: Colaprico D. Bright M. Forward Larisey C. Forward Ekic E. 90' Out: Rader K.

Agudelo L. Goalkeeper Arias D. Defender Pickett K. 59' Out: Van Zanten A. Fusco J. Midfielder Wynalda T. 90' Out: Dudinha Fazer L. 84' Out: Ascanio K. Portilho G. 71' Out: Godfrey L. Corley G. 59' Out: Barcenas M. Byars T. 59' Out: Ludmila

HDA

Head coach

SAN

Gautrat F. Coaches

Eidevall J. Coaches

Player Statistics

Overall Houston Dash (Women) San Diego Wave FC (Women)

Overview

Shots

Attack

Defending

Goalkeeping

Overview

Player	Grade	Minutes played	Goals	xG	Assists	xA	Total shots	Passes	Yellow cards	Red cards
Faasse K. Forward	7.6	45	1	0.02	1	0.02	1	10/13(77%)	-	-
Wesley K. Defender	7.4	90	-	0.04	-	0.01	1	77/80(96%)	-	-
Byars T. Forward	7.3	32	1	0.87	-	0.03	2	7/9(78%)	1	1
Dali K. Midfielder	7.3	90	-	-	-	0.44	-	53/61(87%)	-	-
Berkely M. Defender	7.2	90	-	-	-	-	-	40/48(83%)	-	-
Godfrey L. Midfielder	7.2	71	-	0.6	1	0.23	2	24/26(92%)	-	-
Rader K. Forward	7.1	89	1	0.17	-	0.1	2	23/32(72%)	-	-
Colaprico D. Midfielder	6.9	45	-	-	-	-	-	7/11(64%)	-	-
Morroni P. Defender	6.9	90	-	-	-	0.07	-	51/54(94%)	1	-
Campbell J. Goalkeeper	6.8	83	-	-	-	-	-	31/36(86%)	-	-
Boattin L. Defender	6.7	67	-	-	-	0.01	-	19/26(73%)	-	-
Corley G. Forward	6.7	32	-	0.23	-	0.2	3	12/13(92%)	-	-
Patterson A. Midfielder	6.7	90	-	-	-	0.05	-	18/25(72%)	1	-
Pickett K. Defender	6.7	32	-	-	-	0.05	-	17/22(77%)	-	-
McNabb K. Defender	6.6	90	-	0.18	-	0.03	1	77/81(95%)	-	-
Nielsen P. Defender	6.6	56	-	-	-	-	-	30/33(91%)	-	-
Van Zanten A. Midfielder	6.6	58	-	-	-	0.03	-	26/34(76%)	1	-
Chapman A. Defender	6.5	23	-	-	1	-	-	6/7(86%)	-	-
Hardin C. Defender	6.5	90	-	-	-	0.01	-	27/40(68%)	-	-
Ludmila Forward	6.4	58	-	0.9	-	0.05	3	10/12(83%)	-	-
Portilho G. Forward	6.3	19	-	-	-	0.02	-	8/8(100%)	-	-
Schmidt S. Midfielder	6.3	23	-	-	-	-	-	5/8(63%)	-	-
Puntigam S. Midfielder	6.2	34	-	-	-	0.02	-	17/25(68%)	-	-
Graham M. Midfielder	6.1	90	-	-	-	0.02	-	25/30(83%)	-	-
Klenke L. Defender	5.7	90	-	-	-	-	-	20/26(77%)	-	-
Ullmark L. Midfielder	5.4	67	-	-	-	0.01	-	7/8(88%)	-	-
DeLisle C. Goalkeeper	-	7	-	-	-	-	-	5/8(63%)	-	-
Fazer L. Midfielder	-	7	-	-	-	0.02	-	12/15(80%)	1	-
Wynalda T. Midfielder	-	1	-	-	-	0.01	-	6/6(100%)	-	-

xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Shots

Player	Total shots	Shots on target	xGOT	Shots off target	Blocked shots	Shots header	Shots inside the Box	Shots outside the Box
Corley G. Forward	3	1	0.28	1	1	-	2	1
Ludmila Forward	3	1	0.18	3	-	-	3	-
Byars T. Forward	2	1	0.82	1	-	-	2	-
Godfrey L. Midfielder	2	2	0.81	-	1	-	1	2
Rader K. Forward	2	1	0.77	-	1	-	1	1
Faasse K. Forward	1	1	0.14	-	-	-	-	1
McNabb K. Defender	1	-	-	1	-	1	1	-
Wesley K. Defender	1	-	-	-	1	1	1	-
Berkely M. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Boattin L. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Campbell J. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Chapman A. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Colaprico D. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Dali K. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
DeLisle C. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Fazer L. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Graham M. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hardin C. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Klenke L. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Morroni P. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nielsen P. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Patterson A. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Pickett K. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Portilho G. Forward	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Puntigam S. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Schmidt S. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Ullmark L. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Van Zanten A. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Wynalda T. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.

Attack

Player	Touches in the opposition Box	Passes	Big chances created	Big chances missed	Assists	xA	Passes in final third	Touches	Passes long	Crosses	Successful dribbles	Fouled	Offsides
Ludmila Forward	10	10/12(83%)	-	2	-	0.05	6/8(75%)	23	-	-	1/2(50%)	-	1
Corley G. Forward	7	12/13(92%)	-	2	-	0.2	9/10(90%)	26	-	-	1/4(25%)	1	-
Byars T. Forward	4	7/9(78%)	-	-	-	0.03	4/6(67%)	17	-	-	-	-	1
Morroni P. Defender	3	51/54(94%)	-	-	-	0.07	13/14(93%)	68	1/1(100%)	-	1/1(100%)	1	-
Van Zanten A. Midfielder	3	26/34(76%)	-	-	-	0.03	7/10(70%)	53	3/3(100%)	-	-	-	1
Dali K. Midfielder	2	53/61(87%)	-	-	-	0.44	21/25(84%)	82	1/1(100%)	3/7(43%)	1/2(50%)	1	1
Godfrey L. Midfielder	2	24/26(92%)	1	1	1	0.23	8/10(80%)	36	-	-	1/3(33%)	-	1
Klenke L. Defender	2	20/26(77%)	-	-	-	-	2/5(40%)	38	1/3(33%)	-	-	1	-
Patterson A. Midfielder	2	18/25(72%)	-	-	-	0.05	1/3(33%)	37	2/4(50%)	-	-	2	-
Ullmark L. Midfielder	2	7/8(88%)	-	-	-	0.01	2/2(100%)	19	1/2(50%)	-	-	1	-
Wesley K. Defender	2	77/80(96%)	-	-	-	0.01	6/8(75%)	97	1/2(50%)	-	-	1	-
Faasse K. Forward	1	10/13(77%)	-	-	1	0.02	3/4(75%)	16	-	-	-	-	-
McNabb K. Defender	1	77/81(95%)	-	-	-	0.03	7/8(88%)	87	3/3(100%)	-	-	-	-
Portilho G. Forward	1	8/8(100%)	-	-	-	0.02	4/4(100%)	12	-	-	-	-	-
Rader K. Forward	1	23/32(72%)	-	-	-	0.1	10/16(63%)	44	2/2(100%)	-	1/2(50%)	3	-
Wynalda T. Midfielder	1	6/6(100%)	-	-	-	0.01	5/5(100%)	9	-	-	-	-	-
Berkely M. Defender	-	40/48(83%)	-	-	-	-	1/5(20%)	65	1/7(14%)	-	-	-	1
Boattin L. Defender	-	19/26(73%)	-	-	-	0.01	5/8(63%)	44	-	-	1/2(50%)	2	-
Campbell J. Goalkeeper	-	31/36(86%)	-	-	-	-	-	47	3/7(43%)	-	-	1	-
Chapman A. Defender	-	6/7(86%)	-	-	1	-	2/3(67%)	13	-	-	-	-	-
Colaprico D. Midfielder	-	7/11(64%)	-	-	-	-	1/2(50%)	19	-	-	-	1	-
DeLisle C. Goalkeeper	-	5/8(63%)	-	-	-	-	-	10	1/4(25%)	-	-	-	-
Fazer L. Midfielder	-	12/15(80%)	-	-	-	0.02	6/8(75%)	19	-	-	-	-	-
Graham M. Midfielder	-	25/30(83%)	-	-	-	0.02	4/5(80%)	44	-	-	-	-	1
Hardin C. Defender	-	27/40(68%)	-	-	-	0.01	4/10(40%)	50	1/5(20%)	-	-	-	-
Nielsen P. Defender	-	30/33(91%)	-	-	-	-	1/4(25%)	43	1/3(33%)	-	-	-	-
Pickett K. Defender	-	17/22(77%)	-	-	-	0.05	5/9(56%)	28	1/2(50%)	1/1(100%)	-	-	-
Puntigam S. Midfielder	-	17/25(68%)	-	-	-	0.02	4/9(44%)	26	-	-	-	-	-
Schmidt S. Midfielder	-	5/8(63%)	-	-	-	-	1/3(33%)	11	-	-	-	-	-

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Defending

Player	Duels	Aerial duels	Ground duels	Foules	Tackles	Interceptions	Clearances	Error leading to goal	Error leading to shot	Own goals
Berkely M. Defender	9	-	6/8(75%)	-	1/6(17%)	-	5	-	-	-
Hardin C. Defender	8	-	3/7(43%)	1	1/3(33%)	3	1	-	-	-
Klenke L. Defender	8	2/3(67%)	1/5(20%)	2	-	1	2	-	-	-
Corley G. Forward	7	-	2/7(29%)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Graham M. Midfielder	7	1/2(50%)	4/5(80%)	-	3/4(75%)	1	2	-	-	-
Patterson A. Midfielder	7	1/1(100%)	3/6(50%)	1	-	2	1	-	-	-
Rader K. Forward	7	-	5/7(71%)	-	1/1(100%)	1	-	-	-	-
Ullmark L. Midfielder	7	-	2/7(29%)	1	-	-	1	-	-	-
Wesley K. Defender	7	2/3(67%)	2/4(50%)	2	1/1(100%)	2	5	-	-	-
Boattin L. Defender	6	1/1(100%)	4/5(80%)	1	1/1(100%)	1	2	-	-	-
Godfrey L. Midfielder	6	-	3/5(60%)	-	2/2(100%)	1	-	-	-	-
Colaprico D. Midfielder	5	-	3/5(60%)	2	2/2(100%)	3	-	-	-	-
Dali K. Midfielder	5	-	2/5(40%)	-	-	1	1	-	-	-
Ludmila Forward	5	-	1/5(20%)	2	-	-	-	-	-	-
Morroni P. Defender	5	-	4/5(80%)	1	1/2(50%)	2	1	-	-	-
Van Zanten A. Midfielder	5	-	2/5(40%)	1	1/2(50%)	1	2	-	-	-
Fazer L. Midfielder	4	1/1(100%)	-	1	-	-	1	-	-	-
Nielsen P. Defender	4	1/1(100%)	1/3(33%)	1	-	2	4	-	-	-
Byars T. Forward	3	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-
McNabb K. Defender	3	2/2(100%)	-	1	-	2	1	-	-	-
Pickett K. Defender	2	-	1/2(50%)	-	1/1(100%)	1	-	-	-	-
Portilho G. Forward	2	-	1/2(50%)	1	-	-	-	-	-	-
Campbell J. Goalkeeper	1	-	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-	1	-
Puntigam S. Midfielder	1	-	-	1	-	1	-	-	-	-
Schmidt S. Midfielder	1	-	-	-	-	1	1	-	-	-
Wynalda T. Midfielder	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Chapman A. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
DeLisle C. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Faasse K. Forward	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-

Goalkeeping

Player	Goals prevented	Goalkeeper saves	xGOT faced	Goals Conceded	Punches	Throws	Sweeper keeper actions
Campbell J. Goalkeeper	0.55	2	1.55	1	-	6	-
DeLisle C. Goalkeeper	0.1	1	1.1	1	-	1	-

Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.

xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.