Indy Eleven - Lexington SC 23.05.2026
- 23/05/26 19:00
-
- 3 : 1
- Finished
1st Half
0:0
2nd Half
3:1
2.64
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
0.28
48
%
Ball possession
52
%
2
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
0
10
Matches
3 - Wins
4 - Draws
3 - Losses
10
Matches
Wins - 4
Draws - 2
Losses - 4
-
90% 9/10
- Both team to score
-
4/10 40%
- 37%
- Ball possession
-
58%
- 16 1.6
- Goals scored per match
- 22 2.2
- 12.98 1.30
- xG (Expected Goals) per match
- 12.86 1.29
- 15 1.5
- Goals conceded per match
- 13 1.3
- 11.59 1.16
- Expected goals conceded (xCG) per match
- 7.53 0.75
Chat
Be the first to leave a comment
Match facts
Did you know that Indy Eleven scores 42% of their goals between the minutes 61-75? This is the highest percentage in the league.
Indy Eleven haven't scored in 0 of their 4 home matches in USL Championship this season.
Lexington SC haven't scored in 2 of their 4 away matches in USL Championship this season.
Indy Eleven's home record this season: 3-1-0.
Predictions
As part of the USL Championship (USA) tournament, the match between teams Indy Eleven and Lexington SC is scheduled. The game will start on 23.05 at 19:00. All sports bettors can follow in-depth Indy Eleven Lexington SC betting tips using the subsequent analysis of teams' statistics and prediction for the match.
1 / 10 of last matches Indy Eleven in all competitions, at least one team did not score
2 / 10 of last matches Indy Eleven in USL Championship, at least one team has not scored
5 / 10 of last matches Lexington SC in all competitions, at least one team did not score
5 / 10 of last matches Lexington SC in USL Championship, at least one team has not scored
6 / 10 of last matches in all competitions Indy Eleven did not draw
7 / 10 of last matches in USL Championship Indy Eleven did not draw
| # | Group Eastern Conference | GP | W | D | L | G | GD | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 21:16 | 5 | 20 | |
| 5 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 15:13 | 2 | 19 | |
| 6 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 16:12 | 4 | 18 | |
| 7 | 11 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 10:10 | 0 | 17 | |
| 8 | 13 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 15:19 | -4 | 17 |
| # | Group Western Conference | GP | W | D | L | G | GD | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 11 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 13:11 | 2 | 16 | |
| 7 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 23:22 | 1 | 16 | |
| 8 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 17:15 | 2 | 15 | |
| 9 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 12:13 | -1 | 15 | |
| 10 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 18:20 | -2 | 15 |
Player Statistics
Overview
Shots
Attack
Defending
Goalkeeping
Overview
| Player | Grade | Minutes played | Goals | xG | Assists | xA | Total shots | Passes | Yellow cards | Red cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Craig P.
Defender
|
7.2 | 90 | - | 0.22 | - | 0.01 | 1 | 42/50(84%) | - | - |
|
Kizza E.
Forward
|
7.2 | 55 | - | 0.05 | 1 | 0.2 | 1 | 4/6(67%) | - | - |
|
Barry H.
|
7 | 24 | - | - | - | - | - | 9/10(90%) | - | - |
|
Mesanvi L.
Forward
|
6.8 | 66 | - | 0.09 | - | 0.03 | 2 | 10/13(77%) | - | - |
|
Burks K.
Defender
|
6.7 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 41/49(84%) | - | - |
|
Dick E.
Goalkeeper
|
6.4 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 6/10(60%) | - | - |
|
Epps M.
Midfielder
|
6.2 | 77 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 10/17(59%) | - | - |
|
Semmle O.
Goalkeeper
|
6.2 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 21/32(66%) | - | - |
|
Lewis J.
Midfielder
|
6.1 | 33 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 6/9(67%) | - | - |
|
Scott T.
Forward
|
6.1 | 13 | - | - | - | - | - | 3/5(60%) | - | - |
|
Firmino N.
Midfielder
|
5.8 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 32/38(84%) | - | - |
|
Blessing L.
Midfielder
|
- | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | 3/3(100%) | - | - |
|
Brown J.
Defender
|
- | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Shots
| Player | Total shots | Shots on target | xGOT | Shots off target | Blocked shots | Shots header | Shots inside the Box | Shots outside the Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mesanvi L.
Forward
|
2 | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | 2 | - |
|
Craig P.
Defender
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | - |
|
Kizza E.
Forward
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | - |
|
Barry H.
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Blessing L.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Brown J.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Burks K.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Dick E.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Epps M.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Firmino N.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Lewis J.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Scott T.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Semmle O.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Attack
| Player | Touches in the opposition Box | Passes | Big chances created | Big chances missed | Assists | xA | Passes in final third | Touches | Passes long | Crosses | Successful dribbles | Fouled | Offsides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mesanvi L.
Forward
|
7 | 10/13(77%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 5/8(63%) | 31 | - | 1/3(33%) | 1/3(33%) | 1 | - |
|
Epps M.
Midfielder
|
3 | 10/17(59%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 5/10(50%) | 35 | - | - | - | 1 | 1 |
|
Craig P.
Defender
|
2 | 42/50(84%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 11/16(69%) | 60 | 1/3(33%) | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - |
|
Firmino N.
Midfielder
|
1 | 32/38(84%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 3/6(50%) | 55 | 1/3(33%) | 1/2(100%) | - | 1 | - |
|
Kizza E.
Forward
|
1 | 4/6(67%) | 1 | - | 1 | 0.2 | 1/2(50%) | 16 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Lewis J.
Midfielder
|
1 | 6/9(67%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 2/4(50%) | 12 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | 3 | - |
|
Scott T.
Forward
|
1 | 3/5(60%) | - | - | - | - | - | 12 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Barry H.
|
- | 9/10(90%) | - | - | - | - | 3/4(75%) | 16 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Blessing L.
Midfielder
|
- | 3/3(100%) | - | - | - | - | 1/1(100%) | 5 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Brown J.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | - | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Burks K.
Defender
|
- | 41/49(84%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 2/6(33%) | 67 | 6/12(50%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Dick E.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 6/10(60%) | - | - | - | - | - | 22 | 1/5(20%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Semmle O.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 21/32(66%) | - | - | - | - | - | 45 | 4/15(27%) | - | - | 1 | - |
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Defending
| Player | Duels | Aerial duels | Ground duels | Foules | Tackles | Interceptions | Clearances | Error leading to goal | Error leading to shot | Own goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Epps M.
Midfielder
|
14 | 4/6(67%) | 2/8(25%) | - | 1/1(100%) | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Firmino N.
Midfielder
|
12 | - | 4/7(57%) | - | 2/3(67%) | 2 | - | - | - | - |
|
Burks K.
Defender
|
11 | 5/6(83%) | 3/5(60%) | 2 | 1/2(50%) | 1 | 6 | - | - | - |
|
Craig P.
Defender
|
6 | 4/5(80%) | 1/1(100%) | - | 1/1(100%) | 2 | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Kizza E.
Forward
|
6 | 2/4(50%) | 1/2(50%) | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Mesanvi L.
Forward
|
5 | - | 2/5(40%) | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - |
|
Scott T.
Forward
|
5 | 1/3(33%) | 2/2(100%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Barry H.
|
4 | - | 1/4(25%) | 2 | 1/1(100%) | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Lewis J.
Midfielder
|
4 | - | 3/4(75%) | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Blessing L.
Midfielder
|
3 | - | 1/2(50%) | 1 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Brown J.
Defender
|
3 | 1/1(100%) | 2/2(100%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Semmle O.
Goalkeeper
|
2 | 1/1(100%) | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Dick E.
Goalkeeper
|
1 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | - |
Goalkeeping
| Player | Goals prevented | Goalkeeper saves | xGOT faced | Goals Conceded | Punches | Throws | Sweeper keeper actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Semmle O.
Goalkeeper
|
-0.37 | 3 | 2.63 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 1 |
|
Dick E.
Goalkeeper
|
-0.76 | 1 | 0.24 | 1 | - | 7 | - |
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
