Internazionale Milano (Women) - Fcf Como (Women) 16.05.2026
-
16/05/26
12:00
|
Round 22
-
- 0 : 3
- Finished
1st Half
0:2
2nd Half
0:1
0
Yellow cards
1
10
Matches
5 - Wins
3 - Draws
2 - Losses
10
Matches
Wins - 2
Draws - 5
Losses - 3
-
60% 6/10
- Both team to score
-
2/10 20%
- 57%
- Ball possession
-
40%
- 21 2.1
- Goals scored per match
- 8 0.8
- 12.58 1.26
- xG (Expected Goals) per match
- 7.91 0.79
- 14 1.4
- Goals conceded per match
- 9 0.9
- 9.18 0.92
- Expected goals conceded (xCG) per match
- 5.12 0.51
Chat
Be the first to leave a comment
Predictions
As part of the Serie A, Women (Italy) tournament, the match between teams Internazionale Milano (Women) and Fcf Como (Women) is scheduled. The game will start on 16.05 at 12:00. All sports bettors can follow in-depth Internazionale Milano (Women) Fcf Como (Women) betting tips using the subsequent analysis of teams' statistics and prediction for the match.
3 / 10 of last matches Internazionale Milano (Women) in all competitions, at least one team did not score
5 / 10 of last matches Internazionale Milano (Women) in Serie A, Women, at least one team has not scored
2 / 7 of the last matches between the teams, at least one of the teams did not score
7 / 10 of last matches Fcf Como (Women) in all competitions, at least one team did not score
7 / 10 of last matches Fcf Como (Women) in Serie A, Women, at least one team has not scored
5 / 10 of last matches Internazionale Milano (Women) in all tournaments ended with her victory
| # | Team | GP | W | D | L | G | GD | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22 | 17 | 4 | 1 | 44:19 | 25 | 55 | |
| 2 | 22 | 13 | 5 | 4 | 49:26 | 23 | 44 | |
| 3 | 22 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 33:19 | 14 | 39 | |
| 7 | 22 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 30:25 | 5 | 32 | |
| 8 | 22 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 24:22 | 2 | 30 | |
| 9 | 22 | 4 | 6 | 12 | 17:34 | -17 | 18 |
Player Statistics
Overview
Shots
Attack
Defending
Goalkeeping
Overview
| Player | Grade | Minutes played | Goals | xG | Assists | xA | Total shots | Passes | Yellow cards | Red cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vaitukaityte L.
Midfielder
|
8.2 | 90 | - | - | 1 | 0.09 | - | 30/37(81%) | - | - |
Capelleti A.
Goalkeeper
|
7.5 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 24/40(60%) | - | - |
|
Howard S.
Defender
|
7.3 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 24/27(89%) | - | - |
Chidiac A.
Midfielder
|
6.9 | 89 | - | 0.07 | - | 0.06 | 1 | 37/37(100%) | - | - |
|
Csiszar H.
Midfielder
|
6.7 | 14 | - | 0.2 | - | 0.01 | 1 | 8/9(89%) | - | - |
|
Glionna B.
Forward
|
6.4 | 45 | - | 0.07 | - | 0.03 | 1 | 14/16(88%) | - | - |
|
Wullaert T.
Forward
|
6.1 | 31 | - | 0.16 | - | 0.04 | 2 | 8/10(80%) | - | - |
|
Ivarsdottir T.
Goalkeeper
|
4 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 40/51(78%) | - | - |
xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Shots
| Player | Total shots | Shots on target | xGOT | Shots off target | Blocked shots | Shots header | Shots inside the Box | Shots outside the Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Wullaert T.
Forward
|
2 | 1 | 0.04 | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 |
|
Chidiac A.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Csiszar H.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | - |
|
Glionna B.
Forward
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Capelleti A.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Howard S.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Ivarsdottir T.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Vaitukaityte L.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Attack
| Player | Touches in the opposition Box | Passes | Big chances created | Big chances missed | Assists | xA | Passes in final third | Touches | Passes long | Crosses | Successful dribbles | Fouled | Offsides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Glionna B.
Forward
|
2 | 14/16(88%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 5/6(83%) | 32 | 1/2(50%) | 1/7(14%) | - | - | - |
|
Csiszar H.
Midfielder
|
1 | 8/9(89%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 4/4(100%) | 12 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Wullaert T.
Forward
|
1 | 8/10(80%) | - | - | - | 0.04 | 6/7(86%) | 15 | 1/1(100%) | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - |
|
Capelleti A.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 24/40(60%) | - | - | - | - | - | 47 | 1/17(6%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Chidiac A.
Midfielder
|
- | 37/37(100%) | - | - | - | 0.06 | 15/15(100%) | 45 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Howard S.
Defender
|
- | 24/27(89%) | - | - | - | - | 1/2(50%) | 45 | 1/3(33%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Ivarsdottir T.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 40/51(78%) | - | - | - | - | - | 57 | 7/17(41%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Vaitukaityte L.
Midfielder
|
- | 30/37(81%) | - | - | 1 | 0.09 | 10/12(83%) | 48 | 2/4(50%) | - | - | 1 | - |
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Defending
| Player | Duels | Aerial duels | Ground duels | Foules | Tackles | Interceptions | Clearances | Error leading to goal | Error leading to shot | Own goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Vaitukaityte L.
Midfielder
|
14 | 1/1(100%) | 7/13(54%) | 4 | 6/6(100%) | 2 | - | - | - | - |
|
Howard S.
Defender
|
6 | 3/3(100%) | 2/3(67%) | 1 | 1/2(50%) | - | 12 | - | - | - |
|
Chidiac A.
Midfielder
|
4 | - | 1/4(25%) | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Glionna B.
Forward
|
3 | 1/1(100%) | 1/2(50%) | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Csiszar H.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Ivarsdottir T.
Goalkeeper
|
1 | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | 1 | - | - |
|
Capelleti A.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Wullaert T.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Goalkeeping
| Player | Goals prevented | Goalkeeper saves | xGOT faced | Goals Conceded | Punches | Throws | Sweeper keeper actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Capelleti A.
Goalkeeper
|
0.24 | 3 | 0.24 | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Ivarsdottir T.
Goalkeeper
|
-2.16 | 1 | 0.84 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
