• Football
• Leagues
• Italy
• Coppa Italia, Women
• Juventus (Women) x Napoli (Women)

Juventus (Women) - Napoli (Women) 29.01.2026

• 29/01/26 14:30 |
  Quarterfinals
• Juventus (Women)

  

  Advancing to next round
  • 2 : 1
  • Finished
  Napoli (Women)
• 2nd match 1st match result: 2-1.

Summary Player Statistics

JUV

Match details

NAP

1st Half 0:0

2nd Half 2:1

JUV

Statistics

NAP

2.41

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

0.6

56 %

Ball possession

44 %

2

Big chances Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.

0

• 1.7 2.1 2.4
• Goals scored per match
• 0.9 1.8 1.2

• 0.9 1 0.8
• Goals conceded per match
• 1.2 1.4 1

• 34.6' 29' 28.1'
• Minutes/Goal scored
• 42.9' 28.1' 40.9'

Full Stats

JUV

H2H Stats

NAP

All tournaments Serie A, Women Coppa Italia, Women 5 matches 10 matches All matches 5 matches All matches 5 matches

• 80% 4wins
• 20% 1draws
• 0wins

More H2H

Chat

Be the first to leave a comment

Go to chat

Top Scorers

Juventus (Women)

Italy Coppa Italia, Women

No data available

Napoli (Women)

Italy Coppa Italia, Women

No data available

Predictions

As part of the Coppa Italia, Women (Italy) tournament, the match between teams Juventus (Women) and Napoli (Women) is scheduled. The game will start on 29.01 at 14:30. All sports bettors can follow in-depth Juventus (Women) Napoli (Women) betting tips using the subsequent analysis of teams' statistics and prediction for the match.

2 / 10 of her last matches Juventus (Women) in all competitions ended in defeat

1 / 6 of last matches Juventus (Women) in Coppa Italia, Women ended in defeat

4 / 10 of last matches Napoli (Women) in all tournaments ended with her victory

2 / 4 of last matches Napoli (Women) in Coppa Italia, Women ended with her victory

2 / 10 of her last matches Juventus (Women) in all competitions ended in defeat

1 / 6 of last matches Juventus (Women) in Coppa Italia, Women ended in defeat

More predictions

Player Statistics

Overall Juventus (Women) Napoli (Women)

Overview

Shots

Attack

Defending

Goalkeeping

Overview

Player	Grade	Minutes played	Goals	xG	Assists	xA	Total shots	Passes	Yellow cards	Red cards
Beccari C. Forward	8	27	-	0.08	2	0.6	1	6/8(75%)	-	-
Thomas L. Forward	7.6	15	1	0.22	-	-	1	1/1(100%)	-	-
Girelli C. Forward	7.5	28	1	0.55	-	0.04	1	13/17(76%)	-	-
Godo E. Midfielder	7.4	75	-	0.02	-	0.03	1	24/30(80%)	-	-
Walti L. Midfielder	7.1	90	-	-	-	0.27	-	56/61(92%)	-	-
Kullberg E. Defender	7	90	-	0.01	-	-	1	31/38(82%)	-	-
Carbonell Nunez E. Defender	6.9	75	-	0.09	-	0.25	1	41/50(82%)	-	-
Vangsgaard A. Forward	6.9	63	-	0.15	-	0.56	2	18/23(78%)	-	-
De Jong D. Goalkeeper	6.8	90	-	-	-	-	-	15/20(75%)	-	-
Lenzini M. Defender	6.7	90	-	-	-	0.01	-	27/35(77%)	-	-
Cambiaghi M. Forward	6.6	62	-	1.12	-	0.02	3	11/14(79%)	-	-
Harviken M. Defender	6.5	90	-	-	-	0.14	-	52/56(93%)	-	-
Krumbiegel P. Midfielder	6.2	27	-	-	-	-	-	4/6(67%)	-	-
Rosucci M. Defender	6.2	90	-	-	-	0.04	-	37/43(86%)	1	-

xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Shots

Player	Total shots	Shots on target	xGOT	Shots off target	Blocked shots	Shots header	Shots inside the Box	Shots outside the Box
Cambiaghi M. Forward	3	-	-	2	1	2	3	-
Vangsgaard A. Forward	2	-	-	1	1	-	1	1
Beccari C. Forward	1	-	-	1	-	-	1	-
Carbonell Nunez E. Defender	1	-	-	1	-	-	1	-
Girelli C. Forward	1	1	0.92	-	-	-	1	-
Godo E. Midfielder	1	-	-	1	-	-	-	1
Kullberg E. Defender	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	1
Thomas L. Forward	1	1	0.96	-	-	-	1	-
De Jong D. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Harviken M. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-
Krumbiegel P. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Lenzini M. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Rosucci M. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Walti L. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.

Attack

Player	Touches in the opposition Box	Passes	Big chances created	Big chances missed	Assists	xA	Passes in final third	Touches	Passes long	Crosses	Successful dribbles	Fouled	Offsides
Cambiaghi M. Forward	5	11/14(79%)	-	-	-	0.02	6/7(86%)	22	-	-	-	-	1
Vangsgaard A. Forward	5	18/23(78%)	-	-	-	0.56	9/11(82%)	42	-	-	1/3(33%)	-	-
Carbonell Nunez E. Defender	2	41/50(82%)	-	-	-	0.25	6/8(75%)	67	-	2/5(40%)	-	-	-
Girelli C. Forward	2	13/17(76%)	-	-	-	0.04	4/5(80%)	22	-	-	-	-	1
Godo E. Midfielder	2	24/30(80%)	-	-	-	0.03	10/14(71%)	50	3/4(75%)	-	1/2(50%)	3	-
Thomas L. Forward	2	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-	1/1(100%)	-	-
Beccari C. Forward	1	6/8(75%)	2	-	2	0.6	2/4(50%)	14	-	-	-	1	-
De Jong D. Goalkeeper	-	15/20(75%)	-	-	-	-	-	27	7/11(64%)	-	-	-	-
Harviken M. Defender	-	52/56(93%)	-	-	-	0.14	6/7(86%)	68	9/11(82%)	-	-	-	-
Krumbiegel P. Midfielder	-	4/6(67%)	-	-	-	-	1/3(33%)	12	-	-	-	-	-
Kullberg E. Defender	-	31/38(82%)	-	-	-	-	1/2(100%)	52	3/7(43%)	-	-	-	-
Lenzini M. Defender	-	27/35(77%)	-	-	-	0.01	6/8(75%)	52	4/11(36%)	-	-	1	-
Rosucci M. Defender	-	37/43(86%)	-	-	-	0.04	8/11(73%)	48	2/3(67%)	-	-	-	-
Walti L. Midfielder	-	56/61(92%)	-	-	-	0.27	17/17(100%)	75	7/9(78%)	1/1(100%)	-	3	-

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Defending

Player	Duels	Aerial duels	Ground duels	Foules	Tackles	Interceptions	Clearances	Error leading to goal	Error leading to shot	Own goals
Godo E. Midfielder	10	-	7/10(70%)	1	2/3(67%)	-	-	-	-	-
Walti L. Midfielder	8	1/1(100%)	4/7(57%)	1	1/1(100%)	1	2	-	-	-
Girelli C. Forward	6	2/4(50%)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Vangsgaard A. Forward	6	1/1(100%)	1/5(20%)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Beccari C. Forward	4	-	1/4(25%)	1	-	-	-	-	-	-
Rosucci M. Defender	4	-	1/4(25%)	1	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-
Kullberg E. Defender	3	-	3/3(100%)	1	1/3(33%)	1	3	-	-	-
Cambiaghi M. Forward	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Carbonell Nunez E. Defender	2	-	1/2(50%)	-	1/1(100%)	-	1	-	-	-
Lenzini M. Defender	2	-	1/2(50%)	1	-	1	1	-	-	-
Harviken M. Defender	1	-	1/1(100%)	-	1/1(100%)	1	3	-	-	-
Krumbiegel P. Midfielder	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Thomas L. Forward	1	-	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
De Jong D. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-

Goalkeeping

Player	Goals prevented	Goalkeeper saves	xGOT faced	Goals Conceded	Punches	Throws	Sweeper keeper actions
De Jong D. Goalkeeper	-0.33	3	0.67	1	-	3	-

Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.

xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.