Jong KRC Genk - Liege 14.02.2026
-
14/02/26
14:00
|
Round 25
-
- 2 : 0
- Finished
1.46
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
0.82
66
%
Ball possession
34
%
1
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
0
- 1.7
- Goals scored per match
- 1.3
- 2.4
- Goals conceded per match
- 1
- 22'
- Minutes/Goal scored
- 39.1'
Chat
Be the first to leave a comment
Match facts
During the last 5 meetings, Jong KRC Genk have won 1 times, there have been 0 draws while RFC Liege have won 4 times. The goal difference is 17-7 in favour of RFC Liege.
Last season's matches: 4-1 (Jong KRC Genk at home) and 3-1 (RFC Liege at home).
Did you know that Jong KRC Genk scores 25% of their goals between the minutes 31-45?
Did you know that RFC Liege scores 27% of their goals between the minutes 31-45?
Predictions
As part of the Challenger Pro League (Belgium) tournament, the match between teams Jong KRC Genk and Liege is scheduled. The game will start on 14.02 at 14:00. All sports bettors can follow in-depth Jong KRC Genk Liege betting tips using the subsequent analysis of teams' statistics and prediction for the match.
6 / 10 of her last matches Jong KRC Genk in all competitions ended in defeat
6 / 10 of last matches Jong KRC Genk in Challenger Pro League ended in defeat
5 / 10 of last matches Liege in all tournaments ended with her victory
5 / 10 of last matches Liege in Challenger Pro League ended with her victory
4 / 5 of last matches between the teams ended in victory Liege
8 / 10 of last matches in all competitions Jong KRC Genk did not draw
| # | Team | GP | W | D | L | G | GD | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 32 | 19 | 7 | 6 | 52:31 | 21 | 64 | |
| 4 | 32 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 44:39 | 5 | 53 | |
| 5 | 32 | 15 | 8 | 9 | 59:46 | 13 | 53 | |
| 14 | 32 | 7 | 10 | 15 | 46:55 | -9 | 31 | |
| 15 | 32 | 7 | 10 | 15 | 42:59 | -17 | 31 | |
| 16 | 32 | 5 | 6 | 21 | 33:55 | -22 | 21 |
Player Statistics
Overview
Shots
Attack
Defending
Goalkeeping
Overview
| Player | Grade | Minutes played | Goals | xG | Assists | xA | Total shots | Passes | Yellow cards | Red cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sattlberger N.
Midfielder
|
8.3 | 90 | 1 | 0.05 | - | 0.05 | 1 | 97/107(91%) | - | - |
Bangoura I.
Midfielder
|
7.5 | 90 | - | 0.08 | - | 0.03 | 2 | 60/65(92%) | 1 | - |
Kiaba Brughmans L.
Goalkeeper
|
7.5 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 40/49(82%) | - | - |
Erabi J.
Forward
|
7.2 | 90 | - | 0.18 | - | 0.49 | 3 | 26/28(93%) | 1 | - |
Ndenge Kongolo J.
Defender
|
7.2 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 80/84(95%) | - | - |
Yokoyama A.
Midfielder
|
7 | 90 | - | 0.11 | - | 0.17 | 2 | 28/31(90%) | - | - |
xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Shots
| Player | Total shots | Shots on target | xGOT | Shots off target | Blocked shots | Shots header | Shots inside the Box | Shots outside the Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Erabi J.
Forward
|
3 | 2 | 0.06 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
|
Bangoura I.
Midfielder
|
2 | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | 2 |
|
Yokoyama A.
Midfielder
|
2 | 2 | 0.55 | - | - | - | 1 | 1 |
|
Sattlberger N.
Midfielder
|
1 | 1 | 0.12 | - | 1 | - | - | 1 |
|
Kiaba Brughmans L.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Ndenge Kongolo J.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Attack
| Player | Touches in the opposition Box | Passes | Big chances created | Big chances missed | Assists | xA | Passes in final third | Touches | Passes long | Crosses | Successful dribbles | Fouled | Offsides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Erabi J.
Forward
|
4 | 26/28(93%) | 1 | - | - | 0.49 | 9/10(90%) | 47 | 1/1(100%) | - | 2/3(67%) | 3 | 1 |
|
Yokoyama A.
Midfielder
|
2 | 28/31(90%) | - | - | - | 0.17 | 15/17(88%) | 58 | 1/1(100%) | 2/10(20%) | 2/6(33%) | - | 3 |
|
Ndenge Kongolo J.
Defender
|
1 | 80/84(95%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 5/5(100%) | 91 | 3/4(75%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Sattlberger N.
Midfielder
|
1 | 97/107(91%) | - | - | - | 0.05 | 22/28(79%) | 116 | 4/7(57%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Bangoura I.
Midfielder
|
- | 60/65(92%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 11/12(92%) | 82 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Kiaba Brughmans L.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 40/49(82%) | - | - | - | - | 1/4(25%) | 50 | 5/14(36%) | - | - | 1 | - |
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Defending
| Player | Duels | Aerial duels | Ground duels | Foules | Tackles | Interceptions | Clearances | Error leading to goal | Error leading to shot | Own goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Erabi J.
Forward
|
22 | 7/13(54%) | 5/9(56%) | 1 | - | - | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Bangoura I.
Midfielder
|
13 | 2/2(100%) | 7/11(64%) | 2 | 5/6(83%) | - | 5 | - | - | - |
|
Yokoyama A.
Midfielder
|
10 | - | 4/10(40%) | - | 2/2(100%) | - | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Ndenge Kongolo J.
Defender
|
8 | 2/4(50%) | 1/4(25%) | 2 | - | - | 4 | - | - | - |
|
Sattlberger N.
Midfielder
|
5 | - | 1/5(20%) | 2 | 1/1(100%) | 1 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Kiaba Brughmans L.
Goalkeeper
|
1 | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Goalkeeping
| Player | Goals prevented | Goalkeeper saves | xGOT faced | Goals Conceded | Punches | Throws | Sweeper keeper actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kiaba Brughmans L.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
