• Football
• Leagues
• USA
• USL Championship
• Orange County Blues x Lexington SC

Orange County Blues - Lexington SC 18.04.2026

• 18/04/26 22:00
• Orange County Blues
  • 0 : 0
  • Finished
  Lexington SC

Summary Player Statistics

OC

Match details

LEX

1st Half 0:0

30 Orange County Blues

41 Lexington SC

2nd Half 0:0

60 Orange County Blues

60 Orange County Blues

65 Lexington SC

71 Orange County Blues

71 Orange County Blues

76 Lexington SC

79 Orange County Blues

79 Orange County Blues

90 Lexington SC

OC

Statistics

LEX

0.79

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

0.22

50 %

Ball possession

50 %

12

Total shots

7

• 1.2 1.1 1.2
• Goals scored per match
• 2 0.7 1.7

• 0.6 1.6 0.6
• Goals conceded per match
• 1.3 1.8 1.5

• 51.7' 34.4' 51.7'
• Minutes/Goal scored
• 27.3' 36' 28.1'

Full Stats

OC

H2H Stats

LEX

All tournaments USL Championship 5 matches 5 matches

• 0wins
• 100% 3draws
• 0wins

More H2H

Chat

Be the first to leave a comment

Go to chat

Top Scorers

Orange County Blues

USA USL Championship

No data available

Lexington SC

USA USL Championship

No data available

Match facts

Last season's matches: 2-2 (Orange County SC at home) and 1-1 (Lexington SC at home).

Lexington SC haven't won in their last 4 games.

Orange County SC haven't scored in 1 of their 4 home matches in USL Championship this season.

Orange County SC wins 1st half in 26% of their matches, Lexington SC in 30% of their matches.

Orange County SC wins 26% of halftimes, Lexington SC wins 30%.

Their last meeting was a draw. (1-1)

When Orange County SC leads 1-0 at home, they win in 83% of their matches.

When Lexington SC leads 0-1 away, they win in 50% of their matches.

When Orange County SC is down 0-1 home, they win 0% of their matches.

When Lexington SC is down 1-0 away, they win 0% of their matches.

In USL Championship, Orange County SC has better performance than Lexington SC.

Orange County SC's performance of the last 5 matches is better than Lexington SC's.

Orange County SC scores 1.65 goals when playing at home and Lexington SC scores 0.9 goals when playing away (on average).

More facts

Predictions

As part of the USL Championship (USA) tournament, the match between teams Orange County Blues and Lexington SC is scheduled. The game will start on 18.04 at 22:00. All sports bettors can follow in-depth Orange County Blues Lexington SC betting tips using the subsequent analysis of teams' statistics and prediction for the match.

6 / 10 of last matches Orange County Blues in all competitions, at least one team did not score

6 / 10 of last matches Orange County Blues in USL Championship, at least one team has not scored

5 / 10 of last matches Lexington SC in all competitions, at least one team did not score

5 / 10 of last matches Lexington SC in USL Championship, at least one team has not scored

8 / 10 of last matches in all competitions Orange County Blues did not lose

8 / 10 of last matches in USL Championship Orange County Blues did not lose

More predictions

OC

Standings

LEX

USA USL Championship

#	Group Eastern Conference	GP	W	D	L	G	GD	P
1	Tampa Bay Rowdies	12	8	4	0	21:7	14	28
2	Louisville City	13	6	2	5	22:20	2	20

#	Group Western Conference	GP	W	D	L	G	GD	P
1	San Antonio Texas	12	5	6	1	18:14	4	21
2	Orange County Blues	11	5	4	2	14:10	4	19
3	Oakland Roots	11	4	4	3	18:16	2	16
10	Las Vegas Lights	11	3	3	5	16:19	-3	12
11	Lexington SC	11	3	3	5	15:15	0	12
12	Monterey Bay FC	12	3	2	7	13:20	-7	11

Full Standings

Player Statistics

Overall Orange County Blues Lexington SC

Overview

Shots

Attack

Defending

Goalkeeping

Overview

Player	Grade	Minutes played	Goals	xG	Assists	xA	Total shots	Passes	Yellow cards	Red cards
Semmle O. Goalkeeper	7.5	90	-	-	-	-	-	20/27(74%)	-	-
Epps M. Midfielder	7.4	90	-	0.03	-	0.02	1	23/31(74%)	-	-
Rando A. Goalkeeper	7.1	90	-	-	-	-	-	17/23(74%)	-	-
Brown J. Defender	6.9	90	-	0.03	-	0.02	1	45/53(85%)	-	-
Scott T. Forward	6.9	25	-	-	-	0.02	-	2/5(40%)	-	-
Tubbs G. Defender	6.7	90	-	0.17	-	-	2	62/70(89%)	-	-
Bazini Y. Midfielder	6.5	11	-	0.06	-	0.02	1	2/2(100%)	-	-
Blessing L. Midfielder	6.5	14	-	-	-	-	-	3/4(75%)	-	-
Brewitt T. Defender	6.4	90	-	-	-	0.01	-	68/75(91%)	1	-
Burks K. Defender	6.4	90	-	0.03	-	-	2	45/48(94%)	1	-
Greene J. Defender	6.4	90	-	-	-	0.02	-	32/36(89%)	1	-
Hegardt C. Midfielder	6.2	79	-	0.04	-	0.17	2	16/20(80%)	-	-
Sylla O. Midfielder	6.2	31	-	-	-	-	-	8/8(100%)	-	-
Zubak E. Forward	6.2	31	-	0.15	-	-	1	2/7(29%)	-	-
Palomino M. Midfielder	6.1	59	-	0.02	-	0.05	1	18/23(78%)	-	-

xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Shots

Player	Total shots	Shots on target	xGOT	Shots off target	Blocked shots	Shots header	Shots inside the Box	Shots outside the Box
Burks K. Defender	2	-	-	2	-	2	2	-
Hegardt C. Midfielder	2	-	-	1	1	-	-	2
Tubbs G. Defender	2	1	0.09	1	-	2	2	-
Bazini Y. Midfielder	1	1	0.04	-	-	-	1	-
Brown J. Defender	1	1	0.1	-	-	1	1	-
Epps M. Midfielder	1	1	0.1	-	-	-	1	-
Palomino M. Midfielder	1	-	-	1	-	-	-	1
Zubak E. Forward	1	-	-	1	-	1	1	-
Blessing L. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Brewitt T. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Greene J. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Rando A. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Scott T. Forward	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Semmle O. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Sylla O. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.

Attack

Player	Touches in the opposition Box	Passes	Big chances created	Big chances missed	Assists	xA	Passes in final third	Touches	Passes long	Crosses	Successful dribbles	Fouled	Offsides
Tubbs G. Defender	3	62/70(89%)	-	-	-	-	-	81	1/4(25%)	-	1/1(100%)	1	-
Burks K. Defender	2	45/48(94%)	-	-	-	-	1/2(50%)	60	1/3(33%)	-	-	-	-
Scott T. Forward	2	2/5(40%)	-	-	-	0.02	2/4(50%)	12	-	-	-	-	-
Bazini Y. Midfielder	1	2/2(100%)	-	-	-	0.02	1/1(100%)	5	-	-	-	1	-
Brewitt T. Defender	1	68/75(91%)	-	-	-	0.01	1/2(50%)	85	7/9(78%)	-	-	-	-
Brown J. Defender	1	45/53(85%)	-	-	-	0.02	9/13(69%)	67	3/7(43%)	-	-	1	-
Epps M. Midfielder	1	23/31(74%)	-	-	-	0.02	7/10(70%)	52	2/5(40%)	-	6/8(75%)	3	-
Palomino M. Midfielder	1	18/23(78%)	-	-	-	0.05	4/7(57%)	32	1/2(50%)	2/4(50%)	1/1(100%)	-	-
Zubak E. Forward	1	2/7(29%)	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-	-	3	-
Blessing L. Midfielder	-	3/4(75%)	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	-	1
Greene J. Defender	-	32/36(89%)	-	-	-	0.02	8/8(100%)	43	-	-	-	-	-
Hegardt C. Midfielder	-	16/20(80%)	-	-	-	0.17	4/4(100%)	32	2/4(50%)	2/4(50%)	-	2	-
Rando A. Goalkeeper	-	17/23(74%)	-	-	-	-	-	31	2/8(25%)	-	-	-	-
Semmle O. Goalkeeper	-	20/27(74%)	-	-	-	-	-	35	6/12(50%)	-	-	-	-
Sylla O. Midfielder	-	8/8(100%)	-	-	-	-	2/2(100%)	16	-	-	-	1	-

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Defending

Player	Duels	Aerial duels	Ground duels	Foules	Tackles	Interceptions	Clearances	Error leading to goal	Error leading to shot	Own goals
Epps M. Midfielder	13	2/2(100%)	9/11(82%)	-	-	2	1	-	-	-
Burks K. Defender	10	4/5(80%)	1/5(20%)	4	1/1(100%)	1	3	-	-	-
Sylla O. Midfielder	9	-	2/8(25%)	-	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-
Zubak E. Forward	8	2/5(40%)	3/3(100%)	1	-	-	-	-	-	-
Brown J. Defender	7	2/6(33%)	1/1(100%)	-	-	1	3	-	-	-
Tubbs G. Defender	7	1/3(33%)	2/4(50%)	-	-	2	4	-	-	-
Greene J. Defender	6	1/2(50%)	-	2	-	-	2	-	-	-
Hegardt C. Midfielder	6	-	3/5(60%)	1	1/1(100%)	1	-	-	-	-
Scott T. Forward	6	2/2(100%)	1/4(25%)	1	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-
Palomino M. Midfielder	5	1/1(100%)	1/4(25%)	1	-	-	-	-	-	-
Brewitt T. Defender	4	2/2(100%)	-	1	-	-	4	-	-	-
Bazini Y. Midfielder	2	-	1/2(50%)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Blessing L. Midfielder	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Rando A. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Semmle O. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Goalkeeping

Player	Goals prevented	Goalkeeper saves	xGOT faced	Goals Conceded	Punches	Throws	Sweeper keeper actions
Semmle O. Goalkeeper	0.43	3	0.43	-	-	5	-
Rando A. Goalkeeper	0.42	2	0.42	-	-	6	-

Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.

xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.