Pittsburgh Riverhounds - Indy Eleven 13.06.2026
- 13/06/26 19:00
-
- 1 : 0
- Finished
1st Half
0:0
2nd Half
1:0
1.03
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
0.42
59
%
Ball possession
41
%
2
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
0
10
Matches
4 - Wins
3 - Draws
3 - Losses
10
Matches
Wins - 5
Draws - 3
Losses - 2
-
40% 4/10
- Both team to score
-
7/10 70%
- 44%
- Ball possession
-
41%
- 12 1.2
- Goals scored per match
- 17 1.7
- 10.39 1.04
- xG (Expected Goals) per match
- 11.03 1.10
- 8 0.8
- Goals conceded per match
- 11 1.1
- 9.66 0.97
- Expected goals conceded (xCG) per match
- 9.49 0.95
Chat
CarterCaptain32
12/06 10:15
Match facts
During the last 10 meetings with Pittsburgh Riverhounds playing at home, Pittsburgh Riverhounds have won 6 times, there have been 1 draws while Indy Eleven have won 3 times. The goal difference is 14-9 in favour of Pittsburgh Riverhounds.
During the last 19 meetings, Pittsburgh Riverhounds have won 8 times, there have been 5 draws while Indy Eleven have won 6 times. The goal difference is 23-18 in favour of Pittsburgh Riverhounds.
Last season's matches: 2-1 (Pittsburgh Riverhounds at home) and 1-0 (Indy Eleven at home).
Indy Eleven have a winning streak of 3 matches in USL Championship.
Who will win?
- Pittsburgh Riverhounds
- Draw
- Indy Eleven
Will both teams score?
- Yes
- No
Who will score first?
- Pittsburgh Riverhounds
- No goal
- Indy Eleven
Predictions
As part of the USL Championship (USA) tournament, the match between teams Pittsburgh Riverhounds and Indy Eleven is scheduled. The game will start on 13.06 at 19:00. All sports bettors can follow in-depth Pittsburgh Riverhounds Indy Eleven betting tips using the subsequent analysis of teams' statistics and prediction for the match.
3 / 10 of her last matches Pittsburgh Riverhounds in all competitions ended in defeat
4 / 10 of last matches Pittsburgh Riverhounds in USL Championship ended in defeat
3 / 10 of the last matches between the teams ended in a victory Pittsburgh Riverhounds
8 / 10 of last matches in all competitions Indy Eleven did not lose
8 / 10 of last matches in USL Championship Indy Eleven did not lose
4 / 10 of the last matches Pittsburgh Riverhounds in all tournaments ended with its victory in the 2nd half
| # | Group Eastern Conference | GP | W | D | L | G | GD | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 13 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 19:13 | 6 | 21 | |
| 4 | 14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 24:22 | 2 | 21 | |
| 5 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 15:13 | 2 | 20 | |
| 6 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 16:12 | 4 | 18 | |
| 7 | 12 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 10:10 | 0 | 18 | |
| 8 | 13 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 15:19 | -4 | 17 |
| # | Group Western Conference | GP | W | D | L | G | GD | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 18:13 | 5 | 23 | |
| 2 | 14 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 23:20 | 3 | 21 |
Player Statistics
Overview
Shots
Attack
Defending
Goalkeeping
Overview
| Player | Grade | Minutes played | Goals | xG | Assists | xA | Total shots | Passes | Yellow cards | Red cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Campuzano N.
Goalkeeper
|
7 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 4/22(18%) | - | - |
|
Dick E.
Goalkeeper
|
6.9 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 8/23(35%) | - | - |
|
Craig P.
Defender
|
6.7 | 72 | - | 0.02 | - | 0.01 | 1 | 28/36(78%) | 1 | - |
|
Goldthorp E.
Midfielder
|
6.7 | 77 | - | 0.24 | - | 0.13 | 3 | 15/25(60%) | - | - |
|
Okello N.
Midfielder
|
6.5 | 18 | - | - | - | - | - | 1/2(50%) | - | - |
|
Mesanvi L.
Forward
|
6.2 | 90 | - | 0.08 | - | 0.12 | 1 | 11/13(85%) | - | - |
|
Barry H.
|
6 | 18 | - | - | - | - | - | 1/2(50%) | - | - |
|
Kizza E.
Forward
|
5.9 | 72 | - | - | - | 0.03 | - | 11/15(73%) | - | - |
xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Shots
| Player | Total shots | Shots on target | xGOT | Shots off target | Blocked shots | Shots header | Shots inside the Box | Shots outside the Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Goldthorp E.
Midfielder
|
3 | 3 | 1.05 | - | - | - | 2 | 1 |
|
Craig P.
Defender
|
1 | 1 | 0.11 | - | - | 1 | 1 | - |
|
Mesanvi L.
Forward
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Barry H.
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Campuzano N.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Dick E.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Kizza E.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Okello N.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Attack
| Player | Touches in the opposition Box | Passes | Big chances created | Big chances missed | Assists | xA | Passes in final third | Touches | Passes long | Crosses | Successful dribbles | Fouled | Offsides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mesanvi L.
Forward
|
4 | 11/13(85%) | - | - | - | 0.12 | 4/4(100%) | 37 | 1/1(100%) | 2/5(40%) | 1/4(25%) | 1 | - |
|
Goldthorp E.
Midfielder
|
3 | 15/25(60%) | - | - | - | 0.13 | 4/11(36%) | 47 | - | 2/9(22%) | - | 2 | - |
|
Kizza E.
Forward
|
3 | 11/15(73%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 5/8(63%) | 24 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | 4 | - |
|
Craig P.
Defender
|
1 | 28/36(78%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 5/7(71%) | 43 | 3/8(38%) | - | - | 1 | 1 |
|
Barry H.
|
- | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Campuzano N.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 4/22(18%) | - | - | - | - | - | 31 | 2/20(10%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Dick E.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 8/23(35%) | - | - | - | - | - | 38 | 5/19(26%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Okello N.
Midfielder
|
- | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | - | 1/2(50%) | 8 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Defending
| Player | Duels | Aerial duels | Ground duels | Foules | Tackles | Interceptions | Clearances | Error leading to goal | Error leading to shot | Own goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mesanvi L.
Forward
|
14 | 1/3(33%) | 5/11(45%) | 2 | 2/3(100%) | 1 | - | - | - | - |
|
Kizza E.
Forward
|
13 | 2/7(29%) | 4/6(67%) | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Goldthorp E.
Midfielder
|
11 | 2/5(40%) | 2/6(33%) | 2 | 1/1(33%) | 1 | - | - | - | - |
|
Craig P.
Defender
|
7 | 1/4(25%) | 1/3(33%) | 3 | - | - | 4 | - | - | - |
|
Okello N.
Midfielder
|
5 | 1/3(33%) | 1/2(50%) | 1 | 1/1(100%) | 1 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Campuzano N.
Goalkeeper
|
2 | 2/2(100%) | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Barry H.
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Dick E.
Goalkeeper
|
1 | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
Goalkeeping
| Player | Goals prevented | Goalkeeper saves | xGOT faced | Goals Conceded | Punches | Throws | Sweeper keeper actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Campuzano N.
Goalkeeper
|
0.53 | 2 | 0.53 | - | 2 | 2 | - |
|
Dick E.
Goalkeeper
|
0.12 | 4 | 1.12 | 1 | - | 8 | - |
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
