Richmond Kickers - Charleston Battery 16.05.2026
- 16/05/26 18:00
-
- 0 : 4
- Finished
1st Half
0:0
2nd Half
0:4
0.18
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
3.67
42
%
Ball possession
58
%
0
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
2
10
Matches
5 - Wins
0 - Draws
5 - Losses
10
Matches
Wins - 5
Draws - 1
Losses - 4
-
20% 2/10
- Both team to score
-
4/10 40%
- 38%
- Ball possession
-
62%
- 11 1.1
- Goals scored per match
- 16 1.6
- 6.2 0.62
- xG (Expected Goals) per match
- 13.85 1.39
- 11 1.1
- Goals conceded per match
- 16 1.6
- 10.03 1.00
- Expected goals conceded (xCG) per match
- 8.75 0.88
Chat
Be the first to leave a comment
Predictions
As part of the USL Cup (USA) tournament, the match between teams Richmond Kickers and Charleston Battery is scheduled. The game will start on 16.05 at 18:00. All sports bettors can follow in-depth Richmond Kickers Charleston Battery betting tips using the subsequent analysis of teams' statistics and prediction for the match.
5 / 10 of her last matches Richmond Kickers in all competitions ended in defeat
4 / 4 of last matches Richmond Kickers in USL Cup ended in defeat
5 / 10 of last matches Charleston Battery in all tournaments ended with her victory
2 / 4 of last matches Charleston Battery in USL Cup ended with her victory
5 / 8 of last matches between the teams ended in victory Charleston Battery
10 / 10 of last matches in all competitions Richmond Kickers did not draw
| # | Group 1 | GP | W | D | L | G | GD | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 11:4 | 7 | 8 | |
| 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3:5 | -2 | 6 |
| # | Group 2 | GP | W | D | L | G | GD | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7:1 | 6 | 9 | |
| 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:3 | 2 | 6 |
Player Statistics
Overview
Shots
Attack
Defending
Goalkeeping
Overview
| Player | Grade | Minutes played | Goals | xG | Assists | xA | Total shots | Passes | Yellow cards | Red cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kelly J.
Defender
|
9.3 | 74 | 1 | 1.05 | - | 0.76 | 3 | 37/44(84%) | 1 | - |
|
Berry M.
Forward
|
8.1 | 74 | 1 | 0.48 | 1 | 0.06 | 2 | 14/22(64%) | - | - |
|
Foster M.
Forward
|
8 | 28 | - | 0.96 | 1 | 0.32 | 2 | 9/9(100%) | - | - |
|
Smith G.
Defender
|
7.9 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 45/58(78%) | - | - |
|
Akpunonu J.
Defender
|
6.7 | 16 | - | - | - | - | - | 10/11(91%) | - | - |
|
Seufert N.
Midfielder
|
6.1 | 90 | - | 0.02 | - | 0.03 | 1 | 36/43(84%) | 1 | - |
|
Murana M.
Defender
|
5.9 | 90 | - | 0.07 | - | - | 1 | 33/37(89%) | - | - |
xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Shots
| Player | Total shots | Shots on target | xGOT | Shots off target | Blocked shots | Shots header | Shots inside the Box | Shots outside the Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kelly J.
Defender
|
3 | 1 | 0.99 | 1 | 1 | - | 3 | 1 |
|
Berry M.
Forward
|
2 | 1 | 0.85 | - | 1 | - | 2 | - |
|
Foster M.
Forward
|
2 | 2 | 0.86 | - | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Murana M.
Defender
|
1 | 1 | 0.1 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Seufert N.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Akpunonu J.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Smith G.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Attack
| Player | Touches in the opposition Box | Passes | Big chances created | Big chances missed | Assists | xA | Passes in final third | Touches | Passes long | Crosses | Successful dribbles | Fouled | Offsides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Foster M.
Forward
|
7 | 9/9(100%) | 1 | - | 1 | 0.32 | 4/4(100%) | 20 | - | - | 1/2(50%) | 1 | - |
|
Berry M.
Forward
|
6 | 14/22(64%) | 1 | - | 1 | 0.06 | 10/13(77%) | 35 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Kelly J.
Defender
|
5 | 37/44(84%) | 2 | - | - | 0.76 | 21/24(88%) | 63 | 4/5(80%) | - | - | 2 | 1 |
|
Murana M.
Defender
|
1 | 33/37(89%) | - | - | - | - | 2/3(67%) | 57 | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Akpunonu J.
Defender
|
- | 10/11(91%) | - | - | - | - | 1/1(100%) | 13 | 2/2(100%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Seufert N.
Midfielder
|
- | 36/43(84%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 6/9(67%) | 53 | 3/4(75%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Smith G.
Defender
|
- | 45/58(78%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 4/9(44%) | 71 | 4/9(44%) | - | - | 1 | - |
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Defending
| Player | Duels | Aerial duels | Ground duels | Foules | Tackles | Interceptions | Clearances | Error leading to goal | Error leading to shot | Own goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Smith G.
Defender
|
14 | 5/6(83%) | 6/8(75%) | 1 | 2/5(40%) | - | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Kelly J.
Defender
|
8 | 1/1(100%) | 5/8(63%) | - | 3/3(100%) | 1 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Foster M.
Forward
|
5 | - | 3/5(60%) | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Seufert N.
Midfielder
|
4 | 1/1(100%) | 2/3(67%) | 1 | 2/2(100%) | 1 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Murana M.
Defender
|
3 | - | 1/2(50%) | - | 1/1(100%) | 1 | 4 | - | - | - |
|
Berry M.
Forward
|
1 | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Akpunonu J.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Goalkeeping
| Player | Goals prevented | Goalkeeper saves | xGOT faced | Goals Conceded | Punches | Throws | Sweeper keeper actions |
|---|
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
